Table 1

Association testing of the 3 TNFAIP3 SNPs among patients with pSS and control patients

SNPNumber of minor alleles (%)All pSS vs controlsLymphoma+ pSS vs controlsLymphoma− pSS vs controlsLymphoma+ pSS vs lymphoma− pSS
Controls (N = 451)All pSS patients (N = 574)pSS patients without lymphoma (N = 549)pSS patients with lymphoma (N = 25)ORPORPORPORP
rs13192841 243 (28) 313 (28) 298 (27) 15 (30) 0.94 .52 1.0 .94 0.93 .50 1.12 .72 
rs2230926 55 (6) 73 (6) 66 (6) 7 (15) 1.26 .24 3.36 .01 1.18 .41 3.26 .011 
rs6922466 220 (25) 283 (25) 272 (25) 11 (22) 0.99 .91 0.81 .56 1.0 .98 0.84 .6 
SNPNumber of minor alleles (%)All pSS vs controlsLymphoma+ pSS vs controlsLymphoma− pSS vs controlsLymphoma+ pSS vs lymphoma− pSS
Controls (N = 451)All pSS patients (N = 574)pSS patients without lymphoma (N = 549)pSS patients with lymphoma (N = 25)ORPORPORPORP
rs13192841 243 (28) 313 (28) 298 (27) 15 (30) 0.94 .52 1.0 .94 0.93 .50 1.12 .72 
rs2230926 55 (6) 73 (6) 66 (6) 7 (15) 1.26 .24 3.36 .01 1.18 .41 3.26 .011 
rs6922466 220 (25) 283 (25) 272 (25) 11 (22) 0.99 .91 0.81 .56 1.0 .98 0.84 .6 

Association testing among control patients, all patients with pSS, and patients with patients without lymphoma or with lymphoma using logistic regression adjusting for top 2 PCs of ancestry informative markers. Significant figures are in bold. OR, odds ratio.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal