Table 2

Prognostic scores of patients with confirmed CML in CP at diagnosis

Men, n = 373Women, n = 326P*Patients living in university hospital catchment areas, n = 257Patients living in other areas, n = 442P*Total, N = 699
Sokal score, no. (%)        
 Low risk 94 (25.2) 62 (19.0)  64 (24.9) 92 (20.8)  156 (22.3) 
 Intermediate risk 164 (44.0) 136 (41.7)  112 (43.6) 188 (42.5)  300 (42.9) 
 High risk 104 (27.9) 116 (35.6)  78 (30.4) 142 (32.1)  220 (31.5) 
 Missing 11 (2.9) 12 (3.7) .080 3 (1.2) 20 (4.5) .072 23 (3.3) 
Hasford score, no. (%)        
 Low risk 127 (34.0) 85 (26.1)  84 (32.7) 128 (29.0)  212 (30.3) 
 Intermediate risk 172 (46.1) 162 (49.7)  120 (46.7) 214 (48.4)  334 (47.8) 
 High risk 56 (15.0) 63 (19.3)  44 (17.1) 75 (17.0)  119 (17.0) 
 Missing 18 (4.8) 16 (4.9) .111 9 (3.5) 25 (5.7) .494 34 (4.9) 
EUTOS score, no. (%)        
 Low risk 298 (79.9) 271 (83.1)  210 (81.7) 359 (81.2)  569 (81.4) 
 High risk 57 (15.3) 41 (12.6)  38 (14.8) 60 (13.6)  98 (14.0) 
 Missing 18 (4.8) 14 (4.3) .538 9 (3.5) 23 (5.2) .548 32 (4.6) 
Men, n = 373Women, n = 326P*Patients living in university hospital catchment areas, n = 257Patients living in other areas, n = 442P*Total, N = 699
Sokal score, no. (%)        
 Low risk 94 (25.2) 62 (19.0)  64 (24.9) 92 (20.8)  156 (22.3) 
 Intermediate risk 164 (44.0) 136 (41.7)  112 (43.6) 188 (42.5)  300 (42.9) 
 High risk 104 (27.9) 116 (35.6)  78 (30.4) 142 (32.1)  220 (31.5) 
 Missing 11 (2.9) 12 (3.7) .080 3 (1.2) 20 (4.5) .072 23 (3.3) 
Hasford score, no. (%)        
 Low risk 127 (34.0) 85 (26.1)  84 (32.7) 128 (29.0)  212 (30.3) 
 Intermediate risk 172 (46.1) 162 (49.7)  120 (46.7) 214 (48.4)  334 (47.8) 
 High risk 56 (15.0) 63 (19.3)  44 (17.1) 75 (17.0)  119 (17.0) 
 Missing 18 (4.8) 16 (4.9) .111 9 (3.5) 25 (5.7) .494 34 (4.9) 
EUTOS score, no. (%)        
 Low risk 298 (79.9) 271 (83.1)  210 (81.7) 359 (81.2)  569 (81.4) 
 High risk 57 (15.3) 41 (12.6)  38 (14.8) 60 (13.6)  98 (14.0) 
 Missing 18 (4.8) 14 (4.3) .538 9 (3.5) 23 (5.2) .548 32 (4.6) 
*

P value for the null hypothesis of no difference between the sexes or the patients’ area of residence.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal