Table 1

Multivariable analysis of risk factors for outcome in the MInT study (823 young good-prognosis [aaIPI = 0, 1] patients)

Risk factorEFSPFSOS
HR [95% CI] without rituximab (n = 410)HR [95% CI] with rituximab (n = 413)HR [95% CI] without rituximab (n = 410)HR [95% CI] with rituximab (n = 413)HR [95% CI] without rituximab (n = 410)HR [95% CI] with rituximab (n = 413)
Elevated LDH 1.9 [1.3-2.8]
(P < .001) 
1.3 [0.8-2.1]
(P = .342) 
1.8 [1.2-2.7]
(P = .005) 
1.7 [1.0-3.1]
(P = .073) 
2.1 [1.2-3.5]
(P = .006) 
1.8 [0.8-3.7]
(P = .151) 
Stages III and IV 1.7 [1.1-2.4]
(P = .008) 
1.9 [1.2-3.1]
(P = .007) 
1.6 [1.1-2.5]
(P = .027) 
2.3 [1.3-4.1]
(P = .004) 
0.9 [0.5-1.8]
(P = .852) 
1.8 [0.8-3.9]
(P = .162) 
>1 Extralymphatic site 1.5 [0.9-2.5]
(P = .102) 
0.8 [0.4-1.7]
(P = .547) 
1.3 [0.7-2.3]
(P = .346) 
0.6 [0.2-1.6]
(P = .302) 
2.5 [1.2-5.2]
(P = .014) 
0.5 [0.1-2.2]
(P = .391) 
Male vs female 1.3 [1.0-1.8]
(P = .092) 
1.1 [0.7-1.7]
(P = .660) 
1.1 [0.8-1.5]
(P = .632) 
1.1 [0.7-1.7]
(P = .799) 
1.3 [0.8-2.1]
(P = .244) 
1.2 [0.6-2.4]
(P = .535) 
Risk factorEFSPFSOS
HR [95% CI] without rituximab (n = 410)HR [95% CI] with rituximab (n = 413)HR [95% CI] without rituximab (n = 410)HR [95% CI] with rituximab (n = 413)HR [95% CI] without rituximab (n = 410)HR [95% CI] with rituximab (n = 413)
Elevated LDH 1.9 [1.3-2.8]
(P < .001) 
1.3 [0.8-2.1]
(P = .342) 
1.8 [1.2-2.7]
(P = .005) 
1.7 [1.0-3.1]
(P = .073) 
2.1 [1.2-3.5]
(P = .006) 
1.8 [0.8-3.7]
(P = .151) 
Stages III and IV 1.7 [1.1-2.4]
(P = .008) 
1.9 [1.2-3.1]
(P = .007) 
1.6 [1.1-2.5]
(P = .027) 
2.3 [1.3-4.1]
(P = .004) 
0.9 [0.5-1.8]
(P = .852) 
1.8 [0.8-3.9]
(P = .162) 
>1 Extralymphatic site 1.5 [0.9-2.5]
(P = .102) 
0.8 [0.4-1.7]
(P = .547) 
1.3 [0.7-2.3]
(P = .346) 
0.6 [0.2-1.6]
(P = .302) 
2.5 [1.2-5.2]
(P = .014) 
0.5 [0.1-2.2]
(P = .391) 
Male vs female 1.3 [1.0-1.8]
(P = .092) 
1.1 [0.7-1.7]
(P = .660) 
1.1 [0.8-1.5]
(P = .632) 
1.1 [0.7-1.7]
(P = .799) 
1.3 [0.8-2.1]
(P = .244) 
1.2 [0.6-2.4]
(P = .535) 

Not adjusted for Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) performance state because only 6 of the 823 patients had an ECOG >1.

CI, confidence interval; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal