Table 2

Multivariate Cox regression analyses of the NK-AML data set

AnalysisOS
Hazard ratioP value
NK-AML patients   
 Age 1.741 .018 
 Blast cell count 1.177 .264 
CEBPA status 0.786 .190 
 Cluster_2 2.722 .004 
FLT3 2.299 .002 
 Sex 0.962 .439 
NPM1 0.432 .001 
CvN method   
 Cluster_1 0.80 .276 
 Custer_2 2.51 .017 
 Cluster_3 0.63 .144 
 Cluster_0 0.67 .154 
 Cluster_4 0.64 .161 
 Cluster_5 did not converge 
AnalysisOS
Hazard ratioP value
NK-AML patients   
 Age 1.741 .018 
 Blast cell count 1.177 .264 
CEBPA status 0.786 .190 
 Cluster_2 2.722 .004 
FLT3 2.299 .002 
 Sex 0.962 .439 
NPM1 0.432 .001 
CvN method   
 Cluster_1 0.80 .276 
 Custer_2 2.51 .017 
 Cluster_3 0.63 .144 
 Cluster_0 0.67 .154 
 Cluster_4 0.64 .161 
 Cluster_5 did not converge 

Multivariate Cox regression analyses illustrating the prognostic power of the NK-AML cluster_2. Cluster_2 was analyzed along with other clinical risk factors for the NK-AML patient data set. Cluster_2 was analyzed together with the other clusters identified by the CvN method. Cluster_5 fitting did not converge because of the few events in this cluster. None of the NK-AML clusters identified by the CvC method were significant in the multivariate Cox regression analysis.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal