Table 2

Thermodynamic energies for the interaction of PF4 with UFH, LMWH, HO16, HO08, HO06, and fondaparinux at 25°C, calculated per mole of PF4 tetramers

ComplexesEnthalpy, ∆H (cal/mol)Comparison*Required enthalpy, ∆Hreq (cal/mol)
PF4/UFH −6682 ± 1150 −4673 ± 1238 
PF4/HO16 −7260 ± 1365 −3415 ± 1865 
PF4/LMWH −6663 ± 906 −3450 ± 1140 
PF4/HO08 −4240 ± 1467 ≈ −3840 ± 717‡ 
PF4/HO06 −2071 ± 35 −3840 ± 717‡ 
PF4/fondaparinux −1333 ± 57 −3840 ± 717‡ 
ComplexesEnthalpy, ∆H (cal/mol)Comparison*Required enthalpy, ∆Hreq (cal/mol)
PF4/UFH −6682 ± 1150 −4673 ± 1238 
PF4/HO16 −7260 ± 1365 −3415 ± 1865 
PF4/LMWH −6663 ± 906 −3450 ± 1140 
PF4/HO08 −4240 ± 1467 ≈ −3840 ± 717‡ 
PF4/HO06 −2071 ± 35 −3840 ± 717‡ 
PF4/fondaparinux −1333 ± 57 −3840 ± 717‡ 
*

A comparison of the minimum required enthalpy with the measured enthalphy indicates if an antigenicity inducing conformational change (similar to UFH, LMWH, and HO16) is thermodynamically allowed (ΔH > ΔHreq), unlikely (ΔH ≈ ΔHreq), or forbidden (ΔH < ΔHreq).

The lower limit for the enthalpy required to drive antigenicity inducing conformational changes was estimated using TΔS by taking either the measured ΔS values (UFH, LMWH, HO16) or assuming ΔS = −12.8 cal/mol/K (for heparins labeled with ‡), which is the average of the entropy changes for UFH and HO16.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal