Inhibitor risk and factor VIII brands in three hemophilia cohort studies

AuthorStudyNo. HTCsNo. PUPsFollow-up (E.D.)TimespanInhibitor rate (%)Adjusted HR for second- vs third-generation FVIII*
Calvez et al FranceCoag PUP cohort 12 303 75 2000-2009 37.6 1.55 (0.97-2.49) 
Collins et al UK National Haemophilia Database 407 50 2000-2011 29.5 2.17 (0.99-4.74) 
Gouw et al Research of Determinants of Inhibitor Development (RODIN) study 29 547 75 2000-2010 32.4 1.60 (1.08-2.37) 
AuthorStudyNo. HTCsNo. PUPsFollow-up (E.D.)TimespanInhibitor rate (%)Adjusted HR for second- vs third-generation FVIII*
Calvez et al FranceCoag PUP cohort 12 303 75 2000-2009 37.6 1.55 (0.97-2.49) 
Collins et al UK National Haemophilia Database 407 50 2000-2011 29.5 2.17 (0.99-4.74) 
Gouw et al Research of Determinants of Inhibitor Development (RODIN) study 29 547 75 2000-2010 32.4 1.60 (1.08-2.37) 

E.D., exposure days; FVIII, factor VIII; HTC, hemophilia treatment center.

*

Adjusted HRs did not change after excluding those participating in the RODIN study: 50 of 303 (16.5%) in the French cohort and 88 of407 (21.6%) of the UK cohort.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal