Table 3

Confirmed or unconfirmed best responses to ixazomib by investigator assessment

ResponseDose-escalation cohorts (n = 23)Expansion cohorts (n = 30*)Total (N = 50)
Best response, n (%)    
 CR 
 PR 2 (9) 8 (27) 9 (18) 
  VGPR 1 (4) 1 (2) 
 MR 1 (3) 1 (2) 
 SD 7 (30) 9 (30) 15 (30) 
 PD 14 (61) 12 (40) 25 (50) 
Response rates, n (%) (95% CI)    
 CR+VGPR 1 (4) (<1, 22) 1 (2) (<1, 11) 
 ≥PR 2 (9) (1, 28) 8 (27) (12, 46) 9 (18) (9, 31) 
 ≥MR 2 (9) (1, 28) 9 (30) (15, 49) 10 (20) (10, 34) 
ResponseDose-escalation cohorts (n = 23)Expansion cohorts (n = 30*)Total (N = 50)
Best response, n (%)    
 CR 
 PR 2 (9) 8 (27) 9 (18) 
  VGPR 1 (4) 1 (2) 
 MR 1 (3) 1 (2) 
 SD 7 (30) 9 (30) 15 (30) 
 PD 14 (61) 12 (40) 25 (50) 
Response rates, n (%) (95% CI)    
 CR+VGPR 1 (4) (<1, 22) 1 (2) (<1, 11) 
 ≥PR 2 (9) (1, 28) 8 (27) (12, 46) 9 (18) (9, 31) 
 ≥MR 2 (9) (1, 28) 9 (30) (15, 49) 10 (20) (10, 34) 

CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; VPGR, very good partial response.

*

Includes 3 patients from the MTD dose-escalation cohort.

2 PRs unconfirmed; 1 PR unconfirmed but confirmed as MR. Responses were seen across the expansion cohorts, including 2, 3, 1, and 2 PRs in the relapsed and refractory, bortezomib-relapsed, PI-naive, and prior carfilzomib cohorts, respectively.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal