Table 3

Prognostic factors affecting the OS of patients with ATLL

CharacteristicsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis 1*Multivariate analysis 2
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
nPD-L1, positive (vs nPD-L1 negative) 2.455 (1.144-4.642) .0234 2.373 (1.084-4.625) .0322   
miPD-L1, positive (vs PD-L1 negative) 0.525 (0.341-0.811) .0039   0.48 1(0.309-0.750) .0014 
JCOG-PI, high (vs low) 1.777 (1.149-2.710) .0103 1.750 (1.114-2.721) .0157 1.797 (1.112-2.863) .0172 
Age, >70 (vs ≤70) 1.647 (1.060-2.515) .0269 1.694 (1.080-2.612) .0224 1.656 (1.027-2.615) .0389 
Ann Arbor stage, III/IV (vs I/II) 1.776 (0.988-3.530) .0551 1.640 (0.903-3.283) .1081 1.829 (0.999-3.687) .0503 
LDH, elevated (vs normal) 1.000 (0.664-1.513) .9986 0.850 (0.554-1.309) .4575 0.945 (0.599-1.671) .8089 
CharacteristicsUnivariate analysisMultivariate analysis 1*Multivariate analysis 2
HR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)PHR (95% CI)P
nPD-L1, positive (vs nPD-L1 negative) 2.455 (1.144-4.642) .0234 2.373 (1.084-4.625) .0322   
miPD-L1, positive (vs PD-L1 negative) 0.525 (0.341-0.811) .0039   0.48 1(0.309-0.750) .0014 
JCOG-PI, high (vs low) 1.777 (1.149-2.710) .0103 1.750 (1.114-2.721) .0157 1.797 (1.112-2.863) .0172 
Age, >70 (vs ≤70) 1.647 (1.060-2.515) .0269 1.694 (1.080-2.612) .0224 1.656 (1.027-2.615) .0389 
Ann Arbor stage, III/IV (vs I/II) 1.776 (0.988-3.530) .0551 1.640 (0.903-3.283) .1081 1.829 (0.999-3.687) .0503 
LDH, elevated (vs normal) 1.000 (0.664-1.513) .9986 0.850 (0.554-1.309) .4575 0.945 (0.599-1.671) .8089 
*

The variables included in multivariate analysis 1 for OS were nPD-L1, JCOG-PI, age, Ann Arbor stage, and LDH.

The variables included in multivariate analysis 2 for OS were miPD-L1, JCOG-PI, age, Ann Arbor stage, and LDH.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal