Table 3

Multivariate analysis of risk factors

ParameterhemEFSOS
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Higher age 0.90 0.63-1.28 .55 0.65 0.37-1.15 .14 
Translocation t(11;14) positive 0.52 0.31-0.88 .014 0.56 0.27-1.20 .14 
Gain of 1q21 positive 1.18 0.63-2.21 .61 0.59 0.23-1.54 .28 
Light chain (λ vs κ) 1.54 0.77-3.09 .22 2.79 0.89-8.75 .08 
Higher dFLC 1.96 1.27-3.03 .002 3.43 1.58-7.47 .002 
Mayo score (II/III vs I)* 0.84 0.49-1.43 .51 1.82 0.80-4.15 .15 
Lower MDRD 1.28 0.95-1.72 .11 1.10 0.77-1.57 .60 
Effectively reduced melphalan dosage 4.97 2.00-12.38 <.001 2.21 0.72-6.79 .17 
ParameterhemEFSOS
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Higher age 0.90 0.63-1.28 .55 0.65 0.37-1.15 .14 
Translocation t(11;14) positive 0.52 0.31-0.88 .014 0.56 0.27-1.20 .14 
Gain of 1q21 positive 1.18 0.63-2.21 .61 0.59 0.23-1.54 .28 
Light chain (λ vs κ) 1.54 0.77-3.09 .22 2.79 0.89-8.75 .08 
Higher dFLC 1.96 1.27-3.03 .002 3.43 1.58-7.47 .002 
Mayo score (II/III vs I)* 0.84 0.49-1.43 .51 1.82 0.80-4.15 .15 
Lower MDRD 1.28 0.95-1.72 .11 1.10 0.77-1.57 .60 
Effectively reduced melphalan dosage 4.97 2.00-12.38 <.001 2.21 0.72-6.79 .17 

Hazard ratios (HRs) are based on unit changes for categorical variables, on 10-year change for age, and on change of interquartile range for other continuous variables. Log-transformed values were used for dFLC. Induction therapy (no vs yes) was used as a stratifying variable. Statistically significant results (P < .05) are in bold.

*

In patients with heart transplant before high-dose chemotherapy, the Mayo score is set at I by definition to account for the improved cardiac situation.

Effectively reduced melphalan dosage refers to melphalan dose reductions as a result of age or severity of organ involvement (n = 7), but not to melphalan dose adjustments according to renal function only.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal