Table 3.

PPV of CagA and CagA-signaling molecules for HP dependence of stage IE/IIE1 gastric DLBCL

Expression of CagA and CagA-signaling molecules in tumor tissueNo. of gastric DLBCL patients who receive HPE as frontline treatment
HP dependent, n = 28HP independent, n = 25
CagA positive 22 
CagA negative 18 
 PPV for CagA* = 22 of 29 (75.9%)   
 Specificity for CagA = 18 of 25 (75.0%)   
p-SHP-2 positive 21 
 PPV for p-SHP-2* = 21 of 28 (75.0%)   
p-ERK positive 22 10 
 PPV for p-ERK* = 22 of 32 (68.8%)   
CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK are all positive   
 Yes 18 
 No 10 21 
 PPV for combined CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK = 18 of 22 (81.8%)   
 Specificity for combined CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK§ = 21 of 25 (84.0%) 
Expression of CagA and CagA-signaling molecules in tumor tissueNo. of gastric DLBCL patients who receive HPE as frontline treatment
HP dependent, n = 28HP independent, n = 25
CagA positive 22 
CagA negative 18 
 PPV for CagA* = 22 of 29 (75.9%)   
 Specificity for CagA = 18 of 25 (75.0%)   
p-SHP-2 positive 21 
 PPV for p-SHP-2* = 21 of 28 (75.0%)   
p-ERK positive 22 10 
 PPV for p-ERK* = 22 of 32 (68.8%)   
CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK are all positive   
 Yes 18 
 No 10 21 
 PPV for combined CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK = 18 of 22 (81.8%)   
 Specificity for combined CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK§ = 21 of 25 (84.0%) 
*

PPV: Number of HP-dependent cases who had CagA expression or CagA-signaling molecules expression divided by the number of the total positive cases for respective CagA expression or CagA-signaling molecule expression.

Specificity: Number of HP-independent cases who had no CagA expression/total HP-independent cases.

PPV: Number of HP-dependent cases who had all CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK expression/total cases expressing all CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK.

§

Specificity: Number of HP-independent cases who did not simultaneously express CagA, p-SHP-2, and p-ERK in tumors/total HP-independent cases.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal