Table 1.

Engraftment of Rh/Hoedull Marrow Cells in Nonablated Recipients

No. Donor CellsCloning Efficiency %*No. of Recipients% Male in Whole Marrow Using Southern Blot Analysis% Male Cells in Whole Marrow Determined Using FISH
Rh/Hoedull 
2,600ρ 82.3 12 1.4 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.2 
3,0001-155 88.7 0.9 ± 0.07 1.1 ± 0.2 
5,500ρ 49.8 1.2 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.3 
10,000ρ 86.7 0.7 ± 0.4 ND 
10,000ρ 81.3 2.2 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 0.4 
Whole marrow 
100 × 106ρ ND 23 24.9 ± 1.9 ND 
No. Donor CellsCloning Efficiency %*No. of Recipients% Male in Whole Marrow Using Southern Blot Analysis% Male Cells in Whole Marrow Determined Using FISH
Rh/Hoedull 
2,600ρ 82.3 12 1.4 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.2 
3,0001-155 88.7 0.9 ± 0.07 1.1 ± 0.2 
5,500ρ 49.8 1.2 ± 0.4 1.0 ± 0.3 
10,000ρ 86.7 0.7 ± 0.4 ND 
10,000ρ 81.3 2.2 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 0.4 
Whole marrow 
100 × 106ρ ND 23 24.9 ± 1.9 ND 

Abbreviation: ND, not done.

*

The cloning efficiency represents the proportion of 7 factor (IL-1, IL-3, CSF-1, GM-CSF, G-CSF, SCF, and FGF), responsive HPP-CFC after 14 days in a double-layer agar culture.

Values are the means ± SEM. Southern blots were probed with pY2 and the percentage male was determined using phosphorimage analysis, taking the male to be 100% and the female as 0%. Loading variability was corrected using an IL-3 probe.

Values are the means ± SEM representing analysis of at least 300 cells from at least 4 different fields of focus. FISH analysis was done using a Y chromosome-specific painting probe. Male slides were 100%, and female slides 0% following this analysis.

ρ Analyzed 6 weeks posttransplant.

F1-155

Analyzed 6 months posttransplant.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal