Table 1.

Composition, efficacy, and safety comparisons

Axicabtagene ciloleucelTisagenlecleucelLisocabtagene maraleucel
Study populations DLBCL, TFL, PMBCL R/R DLBCL CORE DL2* 
Target antigen CD19 CD19 CD19 
Lymphodepletion Flu/Cy Flu/Cy Flu/Cy 
Costimulatory domain CD28 4-1BB 4-1BB 
T-cell composition Unspecified Unspecified 1:1 CD4:CD8 
Cell dose 2 × 106 cells/kg 5 × 108 1 × 108 
OR (best) 82% (N = 108) 53% (N = 81) 81% (N = 27) 
OR (6 mo) 41% (N = 101) 37% (N = 46) 50% (N = 14) 
CR (best) 58% (N = 108) 40% (N = 81) 63% (N = 27) 
CR (6 mo) 36% (N = 101) 30% (N = 46) 50% (N = 14) 
Any grade CRS/NT 94%/87% (N = 108) 58%/21% (N = 99) 24%/17% (N = 29) 
≥Grade 3 CRS 12% (N = 108) 23% (N = 99) 0% (N = 29) 
≥Grade 3 NT 31% (N = 108) 12% (N = 99) 7% (N = 29) 
Grade 5 AEs 4% (N = 108) None — 
Axicabtagene ciloleucelTisagenlecleucelLisocabtagene maraleucel
Study populations DLBCL, TFL, PMBCL R/R DLBCL CORE DL2* 
Target antigen CD19 CD19 CD19 
Lymphodepletion Flu/Cy Flu/Cy Flu/Cy 
Costimulatory domain CD28 4-1BB 4-1BB 
T-cell composition Unspecified Unspecified 1:1 CD4:CD8 
Cell dose 2 × 106 cells/kg 5 × 108 1 × 108 
OR (best) 82% (N = 108) 53% (N = 81) 81% (N = 27) 
OR (6 mo) 41% (N = 101) 37% (N = 46) 50% (N = 14) 
CR (best) 58% (N = 108) 40% (N = 81) 63% (N = 27) 
CR (6 mo) 36% (N = 101) 30% (N = 46) 50% (N = 14) 
Any grade CRS/NT 94%/87% (N = 108) 58%/21% (N = 99) 24%/17% (N = 29) 
≥Grade 3 CRS 12% (N = 108) 23% (N = 99) 0% (N = 29) 
≥Grade 3 NT 31% (N = 108) 12% (N = 99) 7% (N = 29) 
Grade 5 AEs 4% (N = 108) None — 

Courtesy of and adapted from C. Turtle.

AE, adverse event; Cy, cyclophosphamide; DL2, dose level 2; Flu, fludarabine; OR, overall response.

*

CORE group (proposed pivotal population) including DLBCL, not otherwise specified TFL, FL3B, ECOG 0-1, and R/R patients.

CAR T toxicity grading scales differ across studies.

2 patients grade 5 CRS.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal