Table 2.

Selected JAKi trials in PV

AgentTarget(s)Clinical trialNumerosity and study-specific featuresKey resultsToxicitiesComments
RUX JAK1/2 RESPONSE,35  RUX vs BAT RUX (n = 110), BAT (n = 112); HU resistant/ intolerant, in need of phlebotomies, with splenomegaly Hematocrit control without phlebotomy at wk 32: 60% (RUX) vs 18.8% (BAT); SVR ≥35% at wk 32: 40% (RUX) vs 0.9% (BAT); composite end-point: 22.7% (RUX) vs 0.9% (BAT) All grade anemia, 27.2 per 100 p-y; G3/4, 0.9 per 100 p-y; all-grade thrombocytopenia, 14.9 per 100 p-y; G3/4, 2.6 per 100 p-y Led to FDA/EMA approval for HU resistant/intolerant PV 
RESPONSE-2,36  RUX vs BAT RUX (n = 74), BAT (n = 75); HU resistant/ intolerant, in need of phlebotomies, without splenomegaly Hematocrit control at wk 28: 62% (RUX) vs 19% (BAT) G1/2 anemia, 14%; G1/2 thrombocytopenia, 3%; no G3/4 anemia/ thrombocytopenia 
AgentTarget(s)Clinical trialNumerosity and study-specific featuresKey resultsToxicitiesComments
RUX JAK1/2 RESPONSE,35  RUX vs BAT RUX (n = 110), BAT (n = 112); HU resistant/ intolerant, in need of phlebotomies, with splenomegaly Hematocrit control without phlebotomy at wk 32: 60% (RUX) vs 18.8% (BAT); SVR ≥35% at wk 32: 40% (RUX) vs 0.9% (BAT); composite end-point: 22.7% (RUX) vs 0.9% (BAT) All grade anemia, 27.2 per 100 p-y; G3/4, 0.9 per 100 p-y; all-grade thrombocytopenia, 14.9 per 100 p-y; G3/4, 2.6 per 100 p-y Led to FDA/EMA approval for HU resistant/intolerant PV 
RESPONSE-2,36  RUX vs BAT RUX (n = 74), BAT (n = 75); HU resistant/ intolerant, in need of phlebotomies, without splenomegaly Hematocrit control at wk 28: 62% (RUX) vs 19% (BAT) G1/2 anemia, 14%; G1/2 thrombocytopenia, 3%; no G3/4 anemia/ thrombocytopenia 

p-y, patient-years of exposure.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal