Table 3.

Selected JAKi trials in ET

AgentTarget(s)Clinical trialNumerosity and study-specific featuresKey resultsToxicitiesComments
RUX JAK1/2 MAJIC-ET,100  RUX vs BAT RUX (n = 58), BAT (n = 52); HU resistant/ intolerant Complete response rate within 1 y: RUX (46.6%) vs BAT (44.2%); at 2 y, rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and transformation were not significantly different G3/4 anemia, 21% RUX vs 0% BAT (2 patients discontinued RUX for anemia); G3/4 thrombocytopenia, 3.4% RUX vs 0% BAT; infections, 15.5% G3 RUX vs 3.5% G3/4 BAT RUX is not superior to current second-line treatments for ET 
AgentTarget(s)Clinical trialNumerosity and study-specific featuresKey resultsToxicitiesComments
RUX JAK1/2 MAJIC-ET,100  RUX vs BAT RUX (n = 58), BAT (n = 52); HU resistant/ intolerant Complete response rate within 1 y: RUX (46.6%) vs BAT (44.2%); at 2 y, rates of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and transformation were not significantly different G3/4 anemia, 21% RUX vs 0% BAT (2 patients discontinued RUX for anemia); G3/4 thrombocytopenia, 3.4% RUX vs 0% BAT; infections, 15.5% G3 RUX vs 3.5% G3/4 BAT RUX is not superior to current second-line treatments for ET 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal