Table 3

Multivariate analyses of outcomes according to best response in the intent-to-treat population, by IMWG criteria

Hazard ratios (95% CI)
Versus VGPRVersus PRVersus < PR
TTP    
    Patients achieving CR 0.45 (0.24-0.88), P = .019 0.50 (0.29-0.87), P = .013 0.29 (0.17-0.52), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 1.11 (0.63-1.96), P = .73 0.64 (0.36-1.15), P = .14 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.58 (0.42-0.81), P = .001 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.60 (0.38-0.94), P = .025 0.37 (0.23-0.59), P < .0001 
TNT    
    Patients achieving CR 0.52 (0.34-0.81), P = .004 0.58 (0.41-0.81), P = .001 0.40 (0.28-0.57), P = .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 1.10 (0.74-1.65), P = .64 0.76 (0.50-1.16), P = .20 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.69 (0.55-0.88), P = .002 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.65 (0.49-0.88), P = .005 0.47 (0.34-0.64), P < .0001 
TFI    
    Patients achieving CR 0.45 (0.28-0.72), P = .0008 0.50 (0.36-0.71), P = .0001 0.30 (0.21-0.43), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 1.12 (0.73-1.72), P = .61 0.67 (0.44-1.04), P = .072 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.60 (0.48-0.76), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.63 (0.46-0.85), P = .002 0.38 (0.28-0.52), P < .0001 
OS    
    Patients achieving CR 0.96 (0.53-1.75), P = .90 0.89 (0.58-1.36), P = .58 0.46 (0.31-0.67), P = .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 0.92 (0.52-1.62), P = .78 0.47 (0.27-0.82), P = .008 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.52 (0.38-0.70), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.88 (0.59-1.32), P = .54 0.51 (0.34-0.75), P = .0007 
Hazard ratios (95% CI)
Versus VGPRVersus PRVersus < PR
TTP    
    Patients achieving CR 0.45 (0.24-0.88), P = .019 0.50 (0.29-0.87), P = .013 0.29 (0.17-0.52), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 1.11 (0.63-1.96), P = .73 0.64 (0.36-1.15), P = .14 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.58 (0.42-0.81), P = .001 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.60 (0.38-0.94), P = .025 0.37 (0.23-0.59), P < .0001 
TNT    
    Patients achieving CR 0.52 (0.34-0.81), P = .004 0.58 (0.41-0.81), P = .001 0.40 (0.28-0.57), P = .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 1.10 (0.74-1.65), P = .64 0.76 (0.50-1.16), P = .20 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.69 (0.55-0.88), P = .002 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.65 (0.49-0.88), P = .005 0.47 (0.34-0.64), P < .0001 
TFI    
    Patients achieving CR 0.45 (0.28-0.72), P = .0008 0.50 (0.36-0.71), P = .0001 0.30 (0.21-0.43), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 1.12 (0.73-1.72), P = .61 0.67 (0.44-1.04), P = .072 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.60 (0.48-0.76), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.63 (0.46-0.85), P = .002 0.38 (0.28-0.52), P < .0001 
OS    
    Patients achieving CR 0.96 (0.53-1.75), P = .90 0.89 (0.58-1.36), P = .58 0.46 (0.31-0.67), P = .0001 
    Patients achieving VGPR — 0.92 (0.52-1.62), P = .78 0.47 (0.27-0.82), P = .008 
    Patients achieving PR — — 0.52 (0.38-0.70), P < .0001 
    Patients achieving CR + VGPR — 0.88 (0.59-1.32), P = .54 0.51 (0.34-0.75), P = .0007 

CI indicates confidence interval; CR, complete response; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; OS, overall survival; PR, partial response; TFI, treatment-free interval; TNT, time to next therapy; TTP, time to progression; VGPR, very good partial response; and —, not applicable.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal