Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analysis for risk of AML progression in MDS patients

AML transformation univariate analysis
AML transformation multivariate analysis
HR*95% CIPHR*95% CIP
SRSF2 mutation status, mutated vs WT 2.5 1.22-5.1 .012 2.83 1.31-6.12 .008 
U2AF1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 2.53 0.90-7.13 .079 1.25 0.36-4.33 .73 
ASXL1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 2.3 1.15-4.62 .019 2.34 1.12-4.89 .024 
RUNX1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 3.02 1.26-7.26 .013 2.43 0.96-6.17 .062 
TP53 mutation status, mutated vs WT 1.003 1.001-1.005 .009 1.01 1.002-1.008 .001 
IDH1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 3.34 1.19-9.41 .023 2.33 0.75-7.21 .14 
NRAS mutation status, mutated vs WT 3.23 0.98-10.68 .054 1.4 .034-5.79 .64 
Transfusion dependence, dependent vs independent 6.77 1.63-28.09 .008 7.38 0.98-55.5 .052 
IPSS, low vs intermediate 1 vs intermediate 2 vs high 2.84 1.99-4.06 < .001 2.89 1.93-4.31 < .001 
AML transformation univariate analysis
AML transformation multivariate analysis
HR*95% CIPHR*95% CIP
SRSF2 mutation status, mutated vs WT 2.5 1.22-5.1 .012 2.83 1.31-6.12 .008 
U2AF1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 2.53 0.90-7.13 .079 1.25 0.36-4.33 .73 
ASXL1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 2.3 1.15-4.62 .019 2.34 1.12-4.89 .024 
RUNX1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 3.02 1.26-7.26 .013 2.43 0.96-6.17 .062 
TP53 mutation status, mutated vs WT 1.003 1.001-1.005 .009 1.01 1.002-1.008 .001 
IDH1 mutation status, mutated vs WT 3.34 1.19-9.41 .023 2.33 0.75-7.21 .14 
NRAS mutation status, mutated vs WT 3.23 0.98-10.68 .054 1.4 .034-5.79 .64 
Transfusion dependence, dependent vs independent 6.77 1.63-28.09 .008 7.38 0.98-55.5 .052 
IPSS, low vs intermediate 1 vs intermediate 2 vs high 2.84 1.99-4.06 < .001 2.89 1.93-4.31 < .001 
*

HR > 1 indicates an increased risk of an event for the first category listed.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal