Table 1

Updated response rates and survival analysis

RH arm (n = 17)RB arm (n = 35)
Updated response rates   
 ORR (95% CI), % 94.1 (71.3-99.9) 85.7 (69.7-95.2) 
 CR, n (%) 7 (41) 15 (43) 
 PR, n (%) 9 (53) 15 (43) 
 Not evaluable, n (%) 1 (6) 5 (14) 
 ASCT, n (%) 9 (53) 23 (66) 
 No ASCT, n (%) 8 (47) 12 (34) 
 Median duration of response (range), mo 51.3 (8.7-67.4) 50.8 (2.3-64.4) 
  ASCT 37.3 (8.7-64.4) 51.4 (6.3-64.4) 
  No ASCT 52.5 (43.4-67.4) 31.2 (2.3-55.3) 
Landmark analysis  
 5-y PFS ASCT vs no ASCT (95% CI), % 50 (15-77) vs 73 (28-93) (P = .34) 70 (43-86) vs 63% (23-86) (P = .44) 
 5-y OS ASCT vs No ASCT (95% CI), % 75 (31-93) vs 73 (28-93) (P = .81) 91 (69-98) vs 60 (20-85) (P = .055) 
Survival analysis, % (95% CI)  
 PFS   
  2 y 82 (53-94) 81 (63-91) 
  5 y 62 (34-81) 66 (45-80) 
 OS   
  2 y 88 (59-97) 87 (70-95) 
  5 y 74 (44-89) 80 (62-91) 
RH arm (n = 17)RB arm (n = 35)
Updated response rates   
 ORR (95% CI), % 94.1 (71.3-99.9) 85.7 (69.7-95.2) 
 CR, n (%) 7 (41) 15 (43) 
 PR, n (%) 9 (53) 15 (43) 
 Not evaluable, n (%) 1 (6) 5 (14) 
 ASCT, n (%) 9 (53) 23 (66) 
 No ASCT, n (%) 8 (47) 12 (34) 
 Median duration of response (range), mo 51.3 (8.7-67.4) 50.8 (2.3-64.4) 
  ASCT 37.3 (8.7-64.4) 51.4 (6.3-64.4) 
  No ASCT 52.5 (43.4-67.4) 31.2 (2.3-55.3) 
Landmark analysis  
 5-y PFS ASCT vs no ASCT (95% CI), % 50 (15-77) vs 73 (28-93) (P = .34) 70 (43-86) vs 63% (23-86) (P = .44) 
 5-y OS ASCT vs No ASCT (95% CI), % 75 (31-93) vs 73 (28-93) (P = .81) 91 (69-98) vs 60 (20-85) (P = .055) 
Survival analysis, % (95% CI)  
 PFS   
  2 y 82 (53-94) 81 (63-91) 
  5 y 62 (34-81) 66 (45-80) 
 OS   
  2 y 88 (59-97) 87 (70-95) 
  5 y 74 (44-89) 80 (62-91) 

The best clinical response was determined by investigators according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma.11 

CI, confidence interval; PR, partial response.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal