Table 3.

Comparison of the 3 cytogenetic subgroups (S) (MYC translocation, MYC gain, and no MYC activation): significant results

ParameterS1: t(MYC) (n = 21 [62%])S2: MYC gain (n = 5 [15%])S3: no MYC (n = 8 [23%])ComparisonP
Prolymphocytes (range), % 86 (61-100) 79 (66-91) 76 (60-80) S1 vs S2 + S3 .03 
S3 vs S1 + S2 .03 
CD38+, n/N (%) 18/20 (90) 2/5 (40) 0/8 (0) S1 vs S2 + S3 <.0001 
S3 vs S1 + S2 <.001 
No. of chromosomal abnormalities (range) 3 (1-9) 6 (5-21) 10 (1-15) S1 vs S2 + S3 .0005 
S3 vs S1 + S2 .02 
HCK (≥5 abnormalities), n/N (%) 4/20 (20) 5/5 (100) 6/8 (75) S1 vs S2 + S3 .0004 
S2 vs S1 + S3 .01 
Unbalanced translocations, n/N (%) 11/20 (55) 5/5 (100) 7/8 (88) S1 vs S2 + S3 .04 
del17p, n/N (%) 3/21 (14) 4/5 (80) 6/8 (75) S1 vs S2 + S3 .0006 
S3 vs S1 + S2 .03 
tri3, n/N (%) 4/20 (20) 4/5 (80) 0/8 (0) S2 vs S1 + S3 .008 
ParameterS1: t(MYC) (n = 21 [62%])S2: MYC gain (n = 5 [15%])S3: no MYC (n = 8 [23%])ComparisonP
Prolymphocytes (range), % 86 (61-100) 79 (66-91) 76 (60-80) S1 vs S2 + S3 .03 
S3 vs S1 + S2 .03 
CD38+, n/N (%) 18/20 (90) 2/5 (40) 0/8 (0) S1 vs S2 + S3 <.0001 
S3 vs S1 + S2 <.001 
No. of chromosomal abnormalities (range) 3 (1-9) 6 (5-21) 10 (1-15) S1 vs S2 + S3 .0005 
S3 vs S1 + S2 .02 
HCK (≥5 abnormalities), n/N (%) 4/20 (20) 5/5 (100) 6/8 (75) S1 vs S2 + S3 .0004 
S2 vs S1 + S3 .01 
Unbalanced translocations, n/N (%) 11/20 (55) 5/5 (100) 7/8 (88) S1 vs S2 + S3 .04 
del17p, n/N (%) 3/21 (14) 4/5 (80) 6/8 (75) S1 vs S2 + S3 .0006 
S3 vs S1 + S2 .03 
tri3, n/N (%) 4/20 (20) 4/5 (80) 0/8 (0) S2 vs S1 + S3 .008 
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal