Table 2.

Key data establishing the association of posttreatment MRD and clinical outcome

StudyStudy treatmentMethod, threshold, sample sourcePatients with MRD testing% uMRDPFS outcome according to MRD
Kovacs et al 201641  FC, FCR, or BR Flow, 10−4, pB CR: 225 CR: 83 CR: median PFS: 61 (uMRD) vs 35 (MRD+) mo 
PR: 329 PR 49 PR: median PFS: 54 (uMRD) vs 21 (MRD+) mo 
Krämer et al 201752  Allo-HCT Flow, 10−4, BM 39 69 10-y relapse risk 
25% (uMRD) vs 80% (MRD+) 
Fraser et al 201912 Ibrutinib plus BR Flow, 10−4, pB/BM 289 18 2-y PFS 
91.5% (uMRD) vs 75.0% (MRD+) 
Stilgenbauer et al 201821  Venetoclax Flow, 10−4, pB 101 30 2-y PFS 
92.8% (uMRD) vs 84.3% (MRD intermediate) vs 63.2% (MRD high) 
Kater et al 201923  Venetoclax + rituximab ASO-PCR and flow, 10−4, pB/BM 180 62* 3-y PFS 
Only 2% of 83 with uMRD had progressed 
StudyStudy treatmentMethod, threshold, sample sourcePatients with MRD testing% uMRDPFS outcome according to MRD
Kovacs et al 201641  FC, FCR, or BR Flow, 10−4, pB CR: 225 CR: 83 CR: median PFS: 61 (uMRD) vs 35 (MRD+) mo 
PR: 329 PR 49 PR: median PFS: 54 (uMRD) vs 21 (MRD+) mo 
Krämer et al 201752  Allo-HCT Flow, 10−4, BM 39 69 10-y relapse risk 
25% (uMRD) vs 80% (MRD+) 
Fraser et al 201912 Ibrutinib plus BR Flow, 10−4, pB/BM 289 18 2-y PFS 
91.5% (uMRD) vs 75.0% (MRD+) 
Stilgenbauer et al 201821  Venetoclax Flow, 10−4, pB 101 30 2-y PFS 
92.8% (uMRD) vs 84.3% (MRD intermediate) vs 63.2% (MRD high) 
Kater et al 201923  Venetoclax + rituximab ASO-PCR and flow, 10−4, pB/BM 180 62* 3-y PFS 
Only 2% of 83 with uMRD had progressed 

ASO-PCR, allele specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction; CR, complete response; PR, partial response.

*

MRD measured at the end of combination therapy (venetoclax + rituximab) after 7 to 9 months, with ongoing venetoclax therapy for 24 months.

13 patients were lost during follow-up.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal