Table 3.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis for cHL overall survival

DescriptionPoint estimateLower 95% CIUpper 95% CIP
Cohort 1 vs cohort 2 2.300 1.148 4.606 .02 
After Bv or CPI after relapse 0.908 0.492 1.679 .7594 
After allo-HCT after relapse 0.860 0.426 1.738 .6742 
Age at auto-HCT* 1.489 1.183 1.875 .0007 
Time to relapse from auto-HCT 0.596 0.474 0.749 <.0001 
ECOG PS at auto-HCT 1-2 vs 0 1.222 0.663 2.252 .5198 
Disease status at auto-HCT     
 PD vs CR 2.862 0.970 8.445 .0569 
 PR vs CR 0.837 0.420 1.670 .6143 
 SD vs CR 8.822 1.062 73.308 .0439 
DescriptionPoint estimateLower 95% CIUpper 95% CIP
Cohort 1 vs cohort 2 2.300 1.148 4.606 .02 
After Bv or CPI after relapse 0.908 0.492 1.679 .7594 
After allo-HCT after relapse 0.860 0.426 1.738 .6742 
Age at auto-HCT* 1.489 1.183 1.875 .0007 
Time to relapse from auto-HCT 0.596 0.474 0.749 <.0001 
ECOG PS at auto-HCT 1-2 vs 0 1.222 0.663 2.252 .5198 
Disease status at auto-HCT     
 PD vs CR 2.862 0.970 8.445 .0569 
 PR vs CR 0.837 0.420 1.670 .6143 
 SD vs CR 8.822 1.062 73.308 .0439 

ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status.

*

Age was used as a continuous covariate. The coefficient for age is per each 10-year increase in age after relapse.

Transplant-to-relapse time was used as a continuous covariate. The coefficient from transplant to relapse was per each doubling of the elapsed time.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal