Table 6.

Efficacy and safety of NOACs for acute VTE treatment in patients aged 75 y or older

Trial acronymComparisons*Number of patients ≥75 yRecurrent VTE HR (95% CI)Major bleeding HR (95% CI)Major + CRNMB bleeding HR (95% CI)
RECOVER I and II Dabigatran vs warfarin 259 0.65 (0.17-2.45) 0.91 (0.37-2.19) 0.76 (0.47-1.25) 
EINSTEIN DVT and PE Rivaroxaban vs warfarin 1283 0.62 (0.33-1.17) 0.27 (0.13-0.59) 0.84 (0.63-1.12) 
AMPLIFY Apixaban vs warfarin 768 0.50 (0.21-1.20) 0.23 (0.08-0.65) NR 
HOKUSAI Edoxaban vs warfarin 1004 0.50 (0.27-0.94) NR 0.83 (0.62-1.12) 
Pooled estimates 0.55 (0.38-0.82) 0.39 (0.17-0.90)  
Trial acronymComparisons*Number of patients ≥75 yRecurrent VTE HR (95% CI)Major bleeding HR (95% CI)Major + CRNMB bleeding HR (95% CI)
RECOVER I and II Dabigatran vs warfarin 259 0.65 (0.17-2.45) 0.91 (0.37-2.19) 0.76 (0.47-1.25) 
EINSTEIN DVT and PE Rivaroxaban vs warfarin 1283 0.62 (0.33-1.17) 0.27 (0.13-0.59) 0.84 (0.63-1.12) 
AMPLIFY Apixaban vs warfarin 768 0.50 (0.21-1.20) 0.23 (0.08-0.65) NR 
HOKUSAI Edoxaban vs warfarin 1004 0.50 (0.27-0.94) NR 0.83 (0.62-1.12) 
Pooled estimates 0.55 (0.38-0.82) 0.39 (0.17-0.90)  

Adapted from Geldhof et al.46 

CRNMB, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; NR, not reported.

*

Initial treatment with heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin in patients treated with dabigatran or edoxaban

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal