Table 1.

CALR del52 increases the thermal stability of TpoR

Constructs expressedApparent Tm ± SD of corresponding TpoR/EpoR construct (°C)P
TpoR WT 48.35  
TpoR WT/CALR WT 48.26 ± 0.36 <.0001 
TpoR WT/CALR del52 55.07 ± 0.05 
TpoR WT/CALR ins5 49.10 ± 0.54  
TpoR R102P/CALR WT 46.75 ± 0.21 <.0001 
TpoR R102P/CALR del52 50.67 ± 0.38 
TpoR NtoQ/CALR WT 48.31 ± 0.24  
TpoR NtoQ/CALR del52 48.87 ± 0.016  
TpoR 8A/CALR WT 44.75 ± 0.18 =.0154 
TpoR 8A/CALR del52 43.91 ± 0.31 
EpoR WT/CALR WT 49.10 ± 0.17  
EpoR WT/CALR del52 49.40 ± 0.25  
EpoR LFFPL/CALR WT 47.37 ± 0.16 =.0017 
EpoR LFFPL/CALR del52 49.19 ± 0.39 
TpoR Cys less/CALR WT 44.89 ± 0.004 =.0002 
TpoR Cys less/CALR del52 48.62 ± 0.48 
TpoR P106L/CALR WT 43.07 ± 0.07 <.0001 
TpoR P106L/CALR del52 46.71 ± 0.21 
TpoR WT control littermate platelets 43.64 ± 0.05 <.0001 
TpoR WT/Calr del52 KI heterozygous platelet 52.04 ± 0.28 
Constructs expressedApparent Tm ± SD of corresponding TpoR/EpoR construct (°C)P
TpoR WT 48.35  
TpoR WT/CALR WT 48.26 ± 0.36 <.0001 
TpoR WT/CALR del52 55.07 ± 0.05 
TpoR WT/CALR ins5 49.10 ± 0.54  
TpoR R102P/CALR WT 46.75 ± 0.21 <.0001 
TpoR R102P/CALR del52 50.67 ± 0.38 
TpoR NtoQ/CALR WT 48.31 ± 0.24  
TpoR NtoQ/CALR del52 48.87 ± 0.016  
TpoR 8A/CALR WT 44.75 ± 0.18 =.0154 
TpoR 8A/CALR del52 43.91 ± 0.31 
EpoR WT/CALR WT 49.10 ± 0.17  
EpoR WT/CALR del52 49.40 ± 0.25  
EpoR LFFPL/CALR WT 47.37 ± 0.16 =.0017 
EpoR LFFPL/CALR del52 49.19 ± 0.39 
TpoR Cys less/CALR WT 44.89 ± 0.004 =.0002 
TpoR Cys less/CALR del52 48.62 ± 0.48 
TpoR P106L/CALR WT 43.07 ± 0.07 <.0001 
TpoR P106L/CALR del52 46.71 ± 0.21 
TpoR WT control littermate platelets 43.64 ± 0.05 <.0001 
TpoR WT/Calr del52 KI heterozygous platelet 52.04 ± 0.28 

Ba/F3 cells stably expressing TpoR/EpoR constructs along with CALR WT or CALR del52 or platelets from mice (KI-Calr del52/WT or control littermates) were used to analyze the thermal stability of the cytokine receptors. The thermal stability curves (supplemental Figure 8) were thus obtained for each cell type. The temperature at which 50% of the receptors were denatured was denoted as Tm. Table depicts the Tm ± standard deviation (SD) of at least 3 independent experiments. The unpaired Student t test was used to calculate the P values between the groups (indicated in the far-right column).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal