Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

ReferenceCountryNo. of randomized patientsBaseline INRType of VKAVKA indicationTreatment*Follow-up duration, d
Fondevila 200122  Argentina 109 Treatment, 8.4 (6.0-19.6); control, 8.1 (6.0-14.1) NR Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: observation 
Crowther 200020  Canada 92 Treatment, 5.4 (4.5-9.8); control, 5.9 (4.5-9.8) NR Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: placebo 30 
Patel 200017  United States 30 Treatment, 7.2 (6.0-9.2); control, 7.0 (6.1-9.5) VTE, 27%; AF, 44%; CVD, 7%; LVD, 13%; other, 10% Intervention, 2.5 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: placebo Not specified 
Ageno 200219  Italy, Canada 60 Treatment, 6.2; control, 6.0 VTE, 32%; AF, 67%; stroke prophylaxis, 1% Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: observation 30 
Ageno 200518  Italy, United States 59 Treatment, 7.2; control, 7.7 Mechanical heart value, 100% Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: observation 30 
Crowther 200921  Canada, United States, Italy 724 Treatment, 6.0 (4.5-9.9); control, 5.8 (4.5-9.5) Thromboembolism treatment or prevention, AF, or artificial heart valve Intervention, 1.25 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: placebo 90 
ReferenceCountryNo. of randomized patientsBaseline INRType of VKAVKA indicationTreatment*Follow-up duration, d
Fondevila 200122  Argentina 109 Treatment, 8.4 (6.0-19.6); control, 8.1 (6.0-14.1) NR Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: observation 
Crowther 200020  Canada 92 Treatment, 5.4 (4.5-9.8); control, 5.9 (4.5-9.8) NR Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: placebo 30 
Patel 200017  United States 30 Treatment, 7.2 (6.0-9.2); control, 7.0 (6.1-9.5) VTE, 27%; AF, 44%; CVD, 7%; LVD, 13%; other, 10% Intervention, 2.5 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: placebo Not specified 
Ageno 200219  Italy, Canada 60 Treatment, 6.2; control, 6.0 VTE, 32%; AF, 67%; stroke prophylaxis, 1% Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: observation 30 
Ageno 200518  Italy, United States 59 Treatment, 7.2; control, 7.7 Mechanical heart value, 100% Intervention, 1 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: observation 30 
Crowther 200921  Canada, United States, Italy 724 Treatment, 6.0 (4.5-9.9); control, 5.8 (4.5-9.5) Thromboembolism treatment or prevention, AF, or artificial heart valve Intervention, 1.25 mg oral vitamin K; comparison: placebo 90 

A, acenocoumarol; AF, atrial fibrillation; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LVD, left ventricular dysfunction; NR, not reported; W, warfarin.

*

All included studies withheld vitamin K antagonist administration in the treatment and control groups.

Study fulfilled the inclusion criteria but reported 0 events and was therefore not included in the meta-analysis.

Patients may have more than 1 indication for VKA.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal