Table 3.

Distribution of clinical and pathologic variables between high LAM and low LAM cases


Feature

No. patients with high LAM (%)

No. patients with low LAM (%)

Total (%)

P
No.   12 (12)   87 (88)   99 (100)   —  
Clinical features     058* 
IPI Group 1 (0/1)   4 (33)   54 (62)   58 (59)   
Group 2 (2/3)   8 (66)   32 (37)   40 (40)   
Group 3 (4/5)   0 (0)   1 (1)   1 (1)   
BM involvement   6 (50)   44 (51)   50 (51)   
Treatment response     NS 
CR   6 (50)   48 (55)   54 (55)   
PR   6 (50)   36 (41)   42 (42)   
NR   0 (0)   3 (3)   3 (3)   
Pathology features     046 
FL grade      
Grade 1   6 (50)   67 (77)   73 (74)   
Grade 2   4 (33)   16 (18)   20 (20)   
Grade 3   2 (17)   4 (5)   6 (61)   
MZ differentiation   3 (25)   22 (25)   25 (25)   NS  
Transformation
 
0 (0)
 
8 (9)
 
8 (8)
 
NS
 

Feature

No. patients with high LAM (%)

No. patients with low LAM (%)

Total (%)

P
No.   12 (12)   87 (88)   99 (100)   —  
Clinical features     058* 
IPI Group 1 (0/1)   4 (33)   54 (62)   58 (59)   
Group 2 (2/3)   8 (66)   32 (37)   40 (40)   
Group 3 (4/5)   0 (0)   1 (1)   1 (1)   
BM involvement   6 (50)   44 (51)   50 (51)   
Treatment response     NS 
CR   6 (50)   48 (55)   54 (55)   
PR   6 (50)   36 (41)   42 (42)   
NR   0 (0)   3 (3)   3 (3)   
Pathology features     046 
FL grade      
Grade 1   6 (50)   67 (77)   73 (74)   
Grade 2   4 (33)   16 (18)   20 (20)   
Grade 3   2 (17)   4 (5)   6 (61)   
MZ differentiation   3 (25)   22 (25)   25 (25)   NS  
Transformation
 
0 (0)
 
8 (9)
 
8 (8)
 
NS
 

IPI indicates International Prognostic Index score; BM, bone marrow; CR, complete remission; PR, partial remission; NR, no response; NS, not significant; —, ____; and MZ, presence of marginal zone differentiation.

*

IPI group 1 versus 2/3.

CR versus PR/NR.

Grade 1 versus 2/3.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal