Table 3.

Effect of Ragweed Challenge on Eosinophil Rolling and Adhesion to Endothelium in Mesenteric Venules of Wild-Type and P-Selectin–Deficient Mice

Eosinophil Rolling Fraction (%; mean ± SE) Eosinophil Adhesion (adherent eosinophils/100 μm venule length; mean ± SE)
MiceRagweed Challenged Diluent Challenged PMice Ragweed Challenged Diluent ChallengedP
Wild-type  26.7 ± 2.6  9.1 ± 1.5 .002  Wild-type  3.3 ± 1.1  0.4 ± 0.3  .001 
P-selectin–deficient  1.2 ± 0.8  0* NS P-selectin–deficient  0.8 ± 0.5  0* .03 
Eosinophil Rolling Fraction (%; mean ± SE) Eosinophil Adhesion (adherent eosinophils/100 μm venule length; mean ± SE)
MiceRagweed Challenged Diluent Challenged PMice Ragweed Challenged Diluent ChallengedP
Wild-type  26.7 ± 2.6  9.1 ± 1.5 .002  Wild-type  3.3 ± 1.1  0.4 ± 0.3  .001 
P-selectin–deficient  1.2 ± 0.8  0* NS P-selectin–deficient  0.8 ± 0.5  0* .03 

Values are mean ± SE of 5 mice per experimental group. In each group, 2 to 5 postcapillary venules were investigated. The rolling of injected eosinophils (fluorescently labeled) in mesenteric venules are expressed as a fraction of total injected cells (Rf, %). Firm adhesion of injected eosinophils (fluorescently labeled) are expressed as the number of adherent eosinophils/100 μm of venule length.

Abbreviation: NS, not significant.

*

No eosinophil rolling or adhesion was detected during the 1-hour observation period.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal