Table 2.

Analysis of Lymphoma and Lymphoproliferative Disease According to Type of Match and Method of T-Cell Depletion

Method of Lymphocyte Depletion of DonorHLA-Identical Sibling Donors Other Donors
Total No. of Patients Rejection Prophylaxis With CAMPATH-1G Cases of Lymphoma Total No. of PatientsRejection Prophylaxis With CAMPATH-1G Cases of Lymphoma
None  62  62  0  82  82  0  
CAMPATH-1 in vitro (complete depletion)  1,019  332  8 (1.3%)* 622 479  5 (1.3%)  
CAMPATH-1 in vitro (with T-cell addback)  258  31  0  45  30  0  
CAMPATH-1 in vivo 84  84  0  374  374  2 (0.9%)  
E-rosette 0  NA  NA  20  20 5 (29.0%) 
Other methods  6  6  0  10 10  
Method of Lymphocyte Depletion of DonorHLA-Identical Sibling Donors Other Donors
Total No. of Patients Rejection Prophylaxis With CAMPATH-1G Cases of Lymphoma Total No. of PatientsRejection Prophylaxis With CAMPATH-1G Cases of Lymphoma
None  62  62  0  82  82  0  
CAMPATH-1 in vitro (complete depletion)  1,019  332  8 (1.3%)* 622 479  5 (1.3%)  
CAMPATH-1 in vitro (with T-cell addback)  258  31  0  45  30  0  
CAMPATH-1 in vivo 84  84  0  374  374  2 (0.9%)  
E-rosette 0  NA  NA  20  20 5 (29.0%) 
Other methods  6  6  0  10 10  

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

*

The actuarial risk at 2 years posttransplant of developing lymphoma or BLPD was calculated by life table analysis.

The result for E-rosette depletion is significantly different from CAMPATH-1 depletion (P < .0001).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal