Table 2.

Effect of combined serum fractions from different chromatographic procedures on rosette formation

Whole Serum Fraction Combination
C1 + A1 C1 + GF4 C2 + A1 C2 + GF4C1 + S1 C1 + S3 C2 + S1 C2 + S3 A1 + S1A1 + S3 GF4 + S1 GF4 + S3
Relative % rosetting 100  40  93  92  50  81  47  37  72  87 57  34  55  
Average rosette size  4.3  2.8  3.9 4.1  2.5  3.6  2.6  2.4  2.6  3.1  2.45 2.5  3.1  
  +    +  +  +  +  +  +  +  
Whole Serum Fraction Combination
C1 + A1 C1 + GF4 C2 + A1 C2 + GF4C1 + S1 C1 + S3 C2 + S1 C2 + S3 A1 + S1A1 + S3 GF4 + S1 GF4 + S3
Relative % rosetting 100  40  93  92  50  81  47  37  72  87 57  34  55  
Average rosette size  4.3  2.8  3.9 4.1  2.5  3.6  2.6  2.4  2.6  3.1  2.45 2.5  3.1  
  +    +  +  +  +  +  +  +  

Fractions from the conA–Sepharose affinity (each at 10% vol/vol), Sepharose Q anion exchange (A1 at 15% vol/vol; GF at 10% vol/vol), S-200 gel filtration (each at 15% vol/vol), and IgM affinity (each at 15% vol/vol) columns were examined for their ability to support rosette formation when used in combination in the rosetting assay, as described in the legend to Figure 1. The relative percentage rosetting is the average of 2 separate experiments, each using a different batch of fractions from each column. The average rosette size was determined by counting the number of uninfected RBC in at least 100 rosettes per sample on one batch of fractions from each column. + denotes significant difference compared with the size of rosettes formed in whole serum (P = 0.05). The fractions tested were as described in the legend to Table 1.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal