Patient characteristics before ICE chemotherapy
Patient characteristic . | No. patients . |
---|---|
Age (y) | |
Median (range) | 46 (20-66) |
Younger than 60 | 75 |
60 or older | 10 |
Response to primary therapy | |
Induction partial response (IPR) | 40 |
Induction failure (IF) | 45 |
Histologic diagnosis (WHO classification) | |
Diffuse large B-cell | 71 |
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified | 12 |
Anaplastic large cell: T-cell | 2 |
Stage | |
I | 1 |
II | 17 |
III | 7 |
IV | 60 |
Karnofsky performance status | |
≥80 | 45 |
<80 | 40 |
Extranodal sites involved | |
≤1 | 38 |
>1 | 47 |
Bone marrow involvement | |
Yes | 20 |
No | 65 |
Prior chemotherapy | |
1 prior regimen | 74 |
CHOP | 34 |
CHOP-like | 9 |
NHL-15* | 31 |
≥2 regimens | 11 |
including CHOP | 10 |
including CHOP-like chemotherapy | 1 |
Second-line IPI | |
1 | 19 |
2 | 22 |
3 | 18 |
4 | 26 |
Age-adjusted second-line IPI | |
1 | 8 |
2 | 22 |
3 | 28 |
4 | 27 |
Patient characteristic . | No. patients . |
---|---|
Age (y) | |
Median (range) | 46 (20-66) |
Younger than 60 | 75 |
60 or older | 10 |
Response to primary therapy | |
Induction partial response (IPR) | 40 |
Induction failure (IF) | 45 |
Histologic diagnosis (WHO classification) | |
Diffuse large B-cell | 71 |
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified | 12 |
Anaplastic large cell: T-cell | 2 |
Stage | |
I | 1 |
II | 17 |
III | 7 |
IV | 60 |
Karnofsky performance status | |
≥80 | 45 |
<80 | 40 |
Extranodal sites involved | |
≤1 | 38 |
>1 | 47 |
Bone marrow involvement | |
Yes | 20 |
No | 65 |
Prior chemotherapy | |
1 prior regimen | 74 |
CHOP | 34 |
CHOP-like | 9 |
NHL-15* | 31 |
≥2 regimens | 11 |
including CHOP | 10 |
including CHOP-like chemotherapy | 1 |
Second-line IPI | |
1 | 19 |
2 | 22 |
3 | 18 |
4 | 26 |
Age-adjusted second-line IPI | |
1 | 8 |
2 | 22 |
3 | 28 |
4 | 27 |
The details of the NHL-15 regimen have been described elsewhere.27