Table 2.

Results of a multivariate analysis to find prognostic factors for molecular remission post-DLI in 66 patients who relapsed post-allogeneic SCT for CML

VariableNo. of patientsRR95% CIP value
Type of relapse at time of DLI     
 Molecular 1.00   
 Cytogenetic 19 0.55 0.2-1.4 .21 
 Hematologic, CP 30 0.24 0.1-0.6 .002 
 Hematologic, AP 0.07 0.02-0.44 .001  
Interval SCT to relapse     
 <9 months 25 1.00   
 ≥9 months 41 2.82 1.35-5.92 .006  
Donor match     
 HLA-identical sibling 35 1.00   
 Matched unrelated 31 1.91 0.78-4.70 .16  
GVHD prophylaxis     
 Non-TCD 22 1.00   
 TCD 44 1.06 0.44-2.56 .89 
VariableNo. of patientsRR95% CIP value
Type of relapse at time of DLI     
 Molecular 1.00   
 Cytogenetic 19 0.55 0.2-1.4 .21 
 Hematologic, CP 30 0.24 0.1-0.6 .002 
 Hematologic, AP 0.07 0.02-0.44 .001  
Interval SCT to relapse     
 <9 months 25 1.00   
 ≥9 months 41 2.82 1.35-5.92 .006  
Donor match     
 HLA-identical sibling 35 1.00   
 Matched unrelated 31 1.91 0.78-4.70 .16  
GVHD prophylaxis     
 Non-TCD 22 1.00   
 TCD 44 1.06 0.44-2.56 .89 

DLI, donor lymphocyte infusion; SCT, stem cell transplantation; CML, chronic myeloid leukemia; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; CP, chronic phase; AP, advanced phase; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; TCD, in vitro or in vivo T-cell depletion with Campath (CD52) monoclonal antibodies.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal