Table 2.

Outcomes among patients with thalassemia major and asymptomatic LV impairment treated with intensive DFO therapy


Characteristic

Subcutaneous n = 21 (range)

Intravenous n = 13 (range)
Median age at first MUGA, y   18 (9-27)   18 (13-24)  
Median follow-up, y   12 (3-20)   11 (5-18)  
Median age at start of chelation therapy, y   13 (2-24)   9 (2-18)  
Mean (±SD) baseline LVEF, %   55 ± 10   54 ± 12  
Mean (±SD) LVEF before intensification, %   43 ± 6   41 ± 5  
Mean (±SD) maximum LVEF after intensification, %   57 ± 7   55 ± 4  
No. patients alive   17   10  
No. patients dead
 
4
 
3
 

Characteristic

Subcutaneous n = 21 (range)

Intravenous n = 13 (range)
Median age at first MUGA, y   18 (9-27)   18 (13-24)  
Median follow-up, y   12 (3-20)   11 (5-18)  
Median age at start of chelation therapy, y   13 (2-24)   9 (2-18)  
Mean (±SD) baseline LVEF, %   55 ± 10   54 ± 12  
Mean (±SD) LVEF before intensification, %   43 ± 6   41 ± 5  
Mean (±SD) maximum LVEF after intensification, %   57 ± 7   55 ± 4  
No. patients alive   17   10  
No. patients dead
 
4
 
3
 

Outcomes among patients with asymptomatic LV impairment are shown in 34 patients receiving intravenous DFO intensification (n = 13) and in those receiving subcutaneous DFO intensification (n = 21). There were no significant differences in outcome between subcutaneous and intravenous regimens, but patients at higher risk generally received intravenous treatment. There was a decrease in LVEF from baseline before the start of DFO intensification (P < .0001). After intensification, maximum LVEF values were significantly higher than before intensification in patients treated by subcutaneous and intravenous DFO (P < .0001).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal