Table 3.

Detailed analysis of cumulative incidence for GvHD grade III/IV, gastrointestinal GvHD stage II/IV, and TRM at one year in relation to donor and recipient NOD2/CARD15 mutations




Cumulative incidence, %

95% CI for cumulative incidence, %

P

Hazard ratio

95% CI for hazard ratio
GvHD III/IV      
   Wild type   19   13-27    1.0   
   R pos   36   21-61   .07   2.1   (0.9-4.7)  
   D pos   44   25-76   .02   2.8   (1.2-6.5)  
   R&D pos   58   36-94   .002   3.9   (1.7-9.2)  
GI GvHD      
   Wild type   18   12-27    1.0   
   R pos   36   21-63   .07   2.1   (0.9-4.8)  
   D pos   31   15-65   .16   2.0   (0.8-5.3)  
   R&D pos   56   36-94   .001   4.3   (1.8-10.1)  
1-year TRM      
   Wild type   20   14-29    1.0   
   R pos   49   31-76   .03   2.2   (1.1-4.6)  
   D pos   59   38-91   .004   3.1   (1.4-6.5)  
   R&D pos
 
83
 
65-100
 
.001
 
3.9
 
(1.7-8.6)
 



Cumulative incidence, %

95% CI for cumulative incidence, %

P

Hazard ratio

95% CI for hazard ratio
GvHD III/IV      
   Wild type   19   13-27    1.0   
   R pos   36   21-61   .07   2.1   (0.9-4.7)  
   D pos   44   25-76   .02   2.8   (1.2-6.5)  
   R&D pos   58   36-94   .002   3.9   (1.7-9.2)  
GI GvHD      
   Wild type   18   12-27    1.0   
   R pos   36   21-63   .07   2.1   (0.9-4.8)  
   D pos   31   15-65   .16   2.0   (0.8-5.3)  
   R&D pos   56   36-94   .001   4.3   (1.8-10.1)  
1-year TRM      
   Wild type   20   14-29    1.0   
   R pos   49   31-76   .03   2.2   (1.1-4.6)  
   D pos   59   38-91   .004   3.1   (1.4-6.5)  
   R&D pos
 
83
 
65-100
 
.001
 
3.9
 
(1.7-8.6)
 

Wild type indicates donor and recipient unmutated (n = 119); R pos, mutations in recipients only (n = 22); D pos, mutations in donors only (n = 16); R&D pos, mutations of both recipient and donor (n = 12). Comparison between groups was performed by Cox regression analysis. For each group, significance and hazard ratios are given.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal