Characteristics of consolidation trial patients
. | ICE . | IcE . |
---|---|---|
No. patients | 99 | 103 |
Sex, % | ||
Male | 53 | 50 |
Female | 47 | 50 |
Age, y | ||
Median | 37 | 42 |
Mean | 38 | 40 |
Range | 16-59 | 15-60 |
ECOG performance status, % | ||
0 | 58 | 56 |
1 | 39 | 39 |
2 | 3 | 4 |
3 | 0 | 1 |
FAB classification, institutional, % | ||
M0 | 7 | 2 |
M1 | 17 | 12 |
M2 | 31 | 38 |
M4 | 27 | 31 |
M5 | 13 | 11 |
M6 | 1 | 2 |
M7 | 1 | 2 |
Biphenotypic M4, M6 | 0 | 1 |
Unknown | 2 | 2 |
WCC at diagnosis, % | ||
Greater than 100 × 109/L | 8 | 5 |
Cytogenetic risk group, % | ||
Favorable | 17 | 16 |
Intermediate | 74 | 69 |
Adverse | 4 | 10 |
Unknown | 6 | 6 |
No. of induction courses, % | ||
1 | 96 | 97 |
2 | 4 | 3 |
. | ICE . | IcE . |
---|---|---|
No. patients | 99 | 103 |
Sex, % | ||
Male | 53 | 50 |
Female | 47 | 50 |
Age, y | ||
Median | 37 | 42 |
Mean | 38 | 40 |
Range | 16-59 | 15-60 |
ECOG performance status, % | ||
0 | 58 | 56 |
1 | 39 | 39 |
2 | 3 | 4 |
3 | 0 | 1 |
FAB classification, institutional, % | ||
M0 | 7 | 2 |
M1 | 17 | 12 |
M2 | 31 | 38 |
M4 | 27 | 31 |
M5 | 13 | 11 |
M6 | 1 | 2 |
M7 | 1 | 2 |
Biphenotypic M4, M6 | 0 | 1 |
Unknown | 2 | 2 |
WCC at diagnosis, % | ||
Greater than 100 × 109/L | 8 | 5 |
Cytogenetic risk group, % | ||
Favorable | 17 | 16 |
Intermediate | 74 | 69 |
Adverse | 4 | 10 |
Unknown | 6 | 6 |
No. of induction courses, % | ||
1 | 96 | 97 |
2 | 4 | 3 |