Table 1.

Angiogenic effects of GAS6 and Axl-Ig on the chick CAM


Stimulation

No. of CAM examined

Vessel/mm3*

Statistical significance
Vehicle   10   4.58 ± 1.16   
VEGF-A165§  10   14.46 ± 2.52   
VEGF-A165 + GAS6   5   7.03 ± 0.47   
FGF-2   5   16.32 ± 1.26   
FGF-2 + GAS6   6   15.50 ± 2.12   
VEGF-A165 + GAS6 + Axl-Ig   3   12.14 ± 2.62   
GAS6   4   4.00 ± 0.62   
GAS6 + Axl-Ig   4   4.21 ± 1.63   
Axl-Ig
 
4
 
4.14 ± 1.43
 

 

Stimulation

No. of CAM examined

Vessel/mm3*

Statistical significance
Vehicle   10   4.58 ± 1.16   
VEGF-A165§  10   14.46 ± 2.52   
VEGF-A165 + GAS6   5   7.03 ± 0.47   
FGF-2   5   16.32 ± 1.26   
FGF-2 + GAS6   6   15.50 ± 2.12   
VEGF-A165 + GAS6 + Axl-Ig   3   12.14 ± 2.62   
GAS6   4   4.00 ± 0.62   
GAS6 + Axl-Ig   4   4.21 ± 1.63   
Axl-Ig
 
4
 
4.14 ± 1.43
 

 
*

Images photographed as described in “Materials and methods” were digitally recorded, and the number of vessels was quantified with an imaging software in 3 randomly selected areas (1 mm3).

Data were analyzed by ANOVA (F = 31.29) and Student-Newman-Keuls test.

P < .05 within indicated stimulations and CAM stimulated by VEGF-A165.

§

VEGF-A165 or FGF-2, GAS6, and Axl-Ig were used at 50 ng, 20 ng, and 200 ng per sponge, respectively.

P < .05 within indicated stimulations and CAM stimulated by vehicle alone.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal