Comparison of G versus G/GM versus GM mobilization on allograft content.
| Parameter . | G Alone . | G/GM . | GM Alone . | P value . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # donors | 96 | 102 | 32 | |
| Total # LP procedures required | 1.26 ± 0.5 | 1.20 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | G vs G/GM: .5; G vs GM: .002 |
| CD34 (× 106/kg) | 9.8 ± 7.2 | 10.9 ± 7.9 | 3.7 ± 2.0 | G vs G/GM: .28; G vs GM: < .001 |
| CD3 (× 108/kg) | 3.5 ± 2.4 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 1.8 ± 1.8 | G vs G/GM: < .0001; G vs GM: < .001 |
| CD4 (× 108/kg) | 2.3 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | G vs G/GM: < .0001; G vs GM: < .001 |
| CD8 (× 108/kg) | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.26 | G vs G/GM: .56; G vs GM: .002 |
| CD19 (× 108/kg) | 0.97 ± 0.9 | 0.89 ± 0.63 | 0.45 ± 0.4 | G vs G/GM: .56; G vs GM: .002 |
| CD16/56 (× 107/kg) | 4.63 ± 3.7 | 2.98 ± 2.36 | 1.66 ± 1.18 | G vs G/GM: < .001; G vs GM: < .0001 |
| Parameter . | G Alone . | G/GM . | GM Alone . | P value . |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| # donors | 96 | 102 | 32 | |
| Total # LP procedures required | 1.26 ± 0.5 | 1.20 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | G vs G/GM: .5; G vs GM: .002 |
| CD34 (× 106/kg) | 9.8 ± 7.2 | 10.9 ± 7.9 | 3.7 ± 2.0 | G vs G/GM: .28; G vs GM: < .001 |
| CD3 (× 108/kg) | 3.5 ± 2.4 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 1.8 ± 1.8 | G vs G/GM: < .0001; G vs GM: < .001 |
| CD4 (× 108/kg) | 2.3 ± 1.4 | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.9 ± 0.8 | G vs G/GM: < .0001; G vs GM: < .001 |
| CD8 (× 108/kg) | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.26 | G vs G/GM: .56; G vs GM: .002 |
| CD19 (× 108/kg) | 0.97 ± 0.9 | 0.89 ± 0.63 | 0.45 ± 0.4 | G vs G/GM: .56; G vs GM: .002 |
| CD16/56 (× 107/kg) | 4.63 ± 3.7 | 2.98 ± 2.36 | 1.66 ± 1.18 | G vs G/GM: < .001; G vs GM: < .0001 |