The Effect of MoAbs on Eosinophil Interactions With IL-4– Stimulated HUVECs
Antibody . | % Adherent . |
---|---|
None | 97.8 ± 2.2 |
P-selectin | 97.9 ± 1.4 |
α-4-integrin | 96.2 ± 2.4 |
β2-integrin | 98.1 ± 0.6 |
P-selectin + α4-integrin | 97.6 ± 1.1 |
P-selectin + β2 integrins | 97.6 ± 1.1 |
α4-integrin + β2-integrin | 20.7 ± 15.9 |
Antibody . | % Adherent . |
---|---|
None | 97.8 ± 2.2 |
P-selectin | 97.9 ± 1.4 |
α-4-integrin | 96.2 ± 2.4 |
β2-integrin | 98.1 ± 0.6 |
P-selectin + α4-integrin | 97.6 ± 1.1 |
P-selectin + β2 integrins | 97.6 ± 1.1 |
α4-integrin + β2-integrin | 20.7 ± 15.9 |
HUVECs were stimulated with IL-4 as described in Fig 1. Before assembly of the flow chamber, HUVECs were treated for 10 minutes at 37°C with HBSS/A alone or HBSS/A containing 5 μg/mL of G1, an MoAb directed against P-selectin. In some experiments, eosinophils were also pretreated 10 minutes at 37°C with either 2 μg/mL of H2/1, an anti–α4-integrin MoAb; 5 μg/mL of an anti–β2-integrin MoAb; or both antibodies before perfusion over IL-4–stimulated HUVECs. To determine the percentage of rolling and adherent cells, images were captured 5 seconds apart and the cells that were stationary during that time were considered adherent. Cells that moved at least 1 cell diameter were considered rolling. The data represent the mean ± SD of at least two experiments.