Table 7.

Test accuracy for proximal compression ultrasound in patients with suspected recurrent lower extremity DVT

Test resultNo. of results per 1000 patients tested (95% CI)No. of participants (studies)Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
Prevalence 15%* in patients suspected of having LE DVTPrevalence 40%* in patients suspected of having LE DVT
True positives 137(120-144) 364 (320-384) 205 (1) ⊕⊕◯◯Low 
False negatives 13 (6-30) 36 (16-80) 
True negatives 850(808-850) 600 (570-600) 205 (1) ⊕⊕◯◯Low 
False positives 0 (0-42) 0 (0-30) 
Inconclusive test results 205 (1)  
Complications arising from the diagnostic test NA 
Test resultNo. of results per 1000 patients tested (95% CI)No. of participants (studies)Certainty of the evidence (GRADE)
Prevalence 15%* in patients suspected of having LE DVTPrevalence 40%* in patients suspected of having LE DVT
True positives 137(120-144) 364 (320-384) 205 (1) ⊕⊕◯◯Low 
False negatives 13 (6-30) 36 (16-80) 
True negatives 850(808-850) 600 (570-600) 205 (1) ⊕⊕◯◯Low 
False positives 0 (0-42) 0 (0-30) 
Inconclusive test results 205 (1)  
Complications arising from the diagnostic test NA 

Patient or population: Patients with suspected recurrent lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Setting: Inpatient and outpatient. Pooled sensitivity: 0.91 (95% CI, 0.80-0.96). Pooled specificity: 1.00 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00).

*

Prevalence of recurrent VTE was estimated to be 13% (1 year) to 30% (10 years) based on the review (20% used in the table).61

Clinical PTP and D-dimer used to evaluate patients with suspected recurrent DVT, prevalence 44.8% (40% used in table).56

Certainty of evidence was downgraded twice for serious imprecision given the small population size from the 2 recurrent lower extremity DVT studies identified for analysis.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal