Table 2.

Effect of DOACs vs LMWHs on patient-important outcomes at the end of 6- to 10-day prophylaxis

OutcomesNo. of participants (studies) followed upGRADE certainty in the evidenceRelative effect (95% CI)Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with LMWHsRisk difference with any DOACs
Mortality 19 900 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High RR 0.64 (0.21-1.98) 1 per 1000 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 1 more) 
PE 19 895 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate* RR 1.01 (0.29-3.53) Study population: 1 per 1000
Moderate: 4 per 1000 
Study population: 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 3 more)
Moderate: 0 fewer per 1000 (3 fewer to 10 more) 
Symptomatic DVT 19 900 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate* RR 1.03 (0.34-3.08) Study population: 1 per 1000
Moderate: 2 per 1000,§ 
Study population: 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 2 more)
Moderate: 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 4 more) 
Major bleeding 21 821 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High RR 1.70 (1.02-2.82) Study population: 2 per 1000
Moderate: 12 per 1000|| 
Study population: 2 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 4 more)
Moderate: 8 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 22 more) 
OutcomesNo. of participants (studies) followed upGRADE certainty in the evidenceRelative effect (95% CI)Anticipated absolute effects
Risk with LMWHsRisk difference with any DOACs
Mortality 19 900 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High RR 0.64 (0.21-1.98) 1 per 1000 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 1 more) 
PE 19 895 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate* RR 1.01 (0.29-3.53) Study population: 1 per 1000
Moderate: 4 per 1000 
Study population: 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 3 more)
Moderate: 0 fewer per 1000 (3 fewer to 10 more) 
Symptomatic DVT 19 900 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate* RR 1.03 (0.34-3.08) Study population: 1 per 1000
Moderate: 2 per 1000,§ 
Study population: 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 2 more)
Moderate: 0 fewer per 1000 (1 fewer to 4 more) 
Major bleeding 21 821 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High RR 1.70 (1.02-2.82) Study population: 2 per 1000
Moderate: 12 per 1000|| 
Study population: 2 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 4 more)
Moderate: 8 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 22 more) 

RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, relative risk.

*

Serious imprecision. The relative estimate of effect is compatible with important harm and important benefit for the intervention that probably crosses the relevant decision threshold.

Guijarro17  reports on the incidence of PE in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients (n = 1 148 301) based on findings from the Spanish National Discharge Database from October 2005 to September 2006 (retrospective database study).

Guijarro17  reports on the incidence of DVT in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients (n = 1 148 301) based on findings from the Spanish National Discharge Database from October 2005 to September 2006 (retrospective database study).

§

We applied the assumption that ∼20% of symptomatic DVTs are proximal, 80% are distal, and 100% of each is of moderate severity.

||

Spencer et al11  reported on incidence rates of major bleeding in older adults based on a community-based study (n = 1223) (prospective and retrospective).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal