Table 2.

D-dimer test accuracy in a low- and high-prevalence population

Test resultNumber of results per 1000 patients tested (95% CI)Number of participants (studies)Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Prevalence 10%*Prevalence 40%*
True positives 96 (87-99) 385 (348-396) 482 (3) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate§ 
False negatives 4 (1-13) 15 (4-52) 
True negatives 425 (384-467) 284 (256-312) 482 (3) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate§ 
False positives 475 (433-516) 316 (286-344) 
Inconclusive test results Not reported 
Complications arising from the diagnostic test Not reported 
Test resultNumber of results per 1000 patients tested (95% CI)Number of participants (studies)Quality of the evidence (GRADE)
Prevalence 10%*Prevalence 40%*
True positives 96 (87-99) 385 (348-396) 482 (3) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate§ 
False negatives 4 (1-13) 15 (4-52) 
True negatives 425 (384-467) 284 (256-312) 482 (3) ⨁⨁⨁◯ Moderate§ 
False positives 475 (433-516) 316 (286-344) 
Inconclusive test results Not reported 
Complications arising from the diagnostic test Not reported 

An interactive summary of findings table is available at: https://gdt.gradepro.org/presentations/#/isof/isof_257cf98c-83bb-488f-b8dd-3c57549fb78e-1590262290785?_k=ad41h5. Patient or population: patients with suspected UEDVT. Setting: inpatient and outpatient. Pooled sensitivity: 0.96 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99). Pooled specificity: 0.47 (95% CI, 0.43-0.52).

*

Data from Constans et al.14 

Data from Kleinjan et al.18 

Not downgraded for risk of bias, although few studies had unclear information on the standard reference test.

§

Downgraded for imprecision; small number of patients included in studies.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal