Table 12.

MAC and NMA HaploBMT with PT/Cy at Johns Hopkins

StudyStudy period, N, age range (median, y)HSC sourceCond. intensityGraft failure, %aGVHD grade II-IV, %aGVHD grade III-IV, %cGVHD, %NRM, %Relapse, %PFS/ EFS, %OS, %
McCurdy et al33  2002-2012, N = 372, 18-75 (55) BM NMA 32 13 11 46 40 50 
Klein et al34  2003-2015, N = 40, 1-25 (20) BM NMA 33 23 (7 moderate to severe) 13 52 43 56 
Current study 2008-2014, N = 96, 1-65 (42) BM MAC 11 15 (6 moderate to severe) 11 43 52 54 
StudyStudy period, N, age range (median, y)HSC sourceCond. intensityGraft failure, %aGVHD grade II-IV, %aGVHD grade III-IV, %cGVHD, %NRM, %Relapse, %PFS/ EFS, %OS, %
McCurdy et al33  2002-2012, N = 372, 18-75 (55) BM NMA 32 13 11 46 40 50 
Klein et al34  2003-2015, N = 40, 1-25 (20) BM NMA 33 23 (7 moderate to severe) 13 52 43 56 
Current study 2008-2014, N = 96, 1-65 (42) BM MAC 11 15 (6 moderate to severe) 11 43 52 54 

BM, bone marrow; Cond., conditioning; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; PFS, progression-free survival.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal