Table 2.

Third-line therapies used in alternate cohort

Third-line regimensn (%)
Platinum-based combination (eg, DHAP) 43 (29) 
Clinical trial 38 (26) 
Etoposide-based (eg, CEPP) 13 (8.9) 
Anthracycline-based combination (eg, CHOP) 13 (8.9) 
Bendamustine-rituximab 9 (6.2) 
Lenalidomide-rituximab 8 (5.4) 
Gemcitabine-based 6 (4.1) 
Ibrutinib 5 (3.4) 
IVAC 3 (2.0) 
Rituximab monotherapy 2 (1.3) 
Other 6 (4.1) 
Consolidation after third line  
 Allogeneic transplant 10 (6.8) 
 Autologous transplant 12 (8.2) 
Third-line regimensn (%)
Platinum-based combination (eg, DHAP) 43 (29) 
Clinical trial 38 (26) 
Etoposide-based (eg, CEPP) 13 (8.9) 
Anthracycline-based combination (eg, CHOP) 13 (8.9) 
Bendamustine-rituximab 9 (6.2) 
Lenalidomide-rituximab 8 (5.4) 
Gemcitabine-based 6 (4.1) 
Ibrutinib 5 (3.4) 
IVAC 3 (2.0) 
Rituximab monotherapy 2 (1.3) 
Other 6 (4.1) 
Consolidation after third line  
 Allogeneic transplant 10 (6.8) 
 Autologous transplant 12 (8.2) 

CEPP, cyclophosphamide/etoposide/procarbazine/prednisone; CHOP, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone; DHAP; dexamethasone/cytarabine/cisplatin; IVAC, ifosfamide/etoposide/cytarabine.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal