Figure 5.
The RNA repertoire of Srsf3-null MKs reflects the failure in activating the maturation program. (A) Volcano plots depicting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between control 8N and ≥16N MKs. The data points marked with blue and red denote significantly down- and upregulated genes (FDR <0.05 and FC >2), respectively. (B) Volcano plots depicting DEGs between Pf4-Srsf3Δ/Δ 8N and ≥16N MKs as in panel A. (C) Venn diagram comparing DEGs in control and Pf4-Srsf3Δ/Δ MKs upon 8N to ≥16N transition. (D) Volcano plot depicting DEGs between control and Pf4-Srsf3Δ/Δ ≥16N MKs as in panel A. (E) Expression of genes encoding proteins central for MK structure and function in control and Pf4-Srsf3Δ/Δ ≥6N MKs. FDR <0.05 unless otherwise noted. (F) Significantly enriched GO terms (Biological Process) among DEGs between control and Pf4-Srsf3Δ/Δ ≥16N MKs (FDR <0.05, FC >2). The x-axis depicts percent genes and -log10 (FDR) of each category. (G) Percentage of RNAs with SRSF3 RNA binding sites (iCLIP peaks) as identified in mouse pluripotent stem cells33 within RNAs induced during MK maturation (left) or differentially expressed between control and Pf4-Srsf3Δ/Δ ≥16N MKs (right). (H) RNA immunoprecipitation (IP) using anti-GFP antibody in MEG-01 megakaryoblast cell lines expressing SRSF3-GFP or only GFP. The y-axis denotes the enrichment of SRSF3 RNA binding over input as measured by RT-qPCR (n = 3). Neg. is a nontarget and SRSF3 a known-target control to demonstrate the specificity of the RNA-IP. (I) Quantification of RNAs in the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of MEG-01 cells following SRSF3 deletion by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. The data are presented as a ratio of nuclear and cytoplasmic mRNA abundance (n = 3). *P ≤ .05. Ctrl, MEG-01 cells targeted with scrambled control guide RNA; FC, fold change; FDR, false discovery rate; KO, MEG-01 cells targeted with SRSF3 guide RNA; ns, not significant.