Ibrutinib-rituximab promotes CD8+ T-cell lytic synapse activity and supports immunotherapy-triggered anti-CLL killing function. (A) Illustration of the autologous cytotoxicity assay using anti-CD3/-CD28–activated T cells (cytolytic T lymphocytes [CTLs]) from B/L, 6M, and 12M time points mixed with target B/L CLL B cells (pulsed with superantigen as a model antigen) with flow-based quantification of T-cell killing function. (B) T-cell–mediated CLL cell death comparing T cells purified from B/L, 6M, and 12M time point samples (n = 30 patients per treatment arm). Data at 6M and 12M were normalized to B/L levels to generate fold change values for each patient. (C) The association between patient’s T-cell killing function (12M ibrutinib-rituximab time point, n = 30) and infection status during ibrutinib-rituximab therapy (no infections vs grade 2 or 3 infections) (Wilcoxon test, P = .01). (D-E) Representative confocal medial optical section and 3-dimensional (3D) volume–rendered images of T-cell:CLL conjugates formed between patient T cells (B/L, 6M, and 12M on-ibrutinib-rituximab [D] or FCR [E]) interacting with autologous B/L CLL B cells (blue, CMAC dyed). Bar charts: quantitative relative recruitment index (RRI) analysis of F-actin polarization (red, rhodamine phalloidin) in T-cell:CLL conjugates (n = 50 patients per treatment arm). (F) Box and violin plots (minimum-maximum) showing the percentage of CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell:CLL conjugates formed from the total T-cell:CLL conjugates in B/L, 6M, and 12M ibrutinib-rituximab time point samples (n = 15 patients). Representative confocal images of CD8+ (white) and CD4+ (green) T-cell conjugates with CLL B cells (blue) at B/L vs on ibrutinib-rituximab therapy. (G) Representative confocal 3D volume–rendered images of granzyme B (GrB; white) expression at CD8+ T-cell synapses, comparing ibrutinib-rituximab and FCR 12M time point samples. (H) Kaplan-Meier curve showing the association between the strength of polarized F-actin CD4+ T-cell:CLL immune synapse interactions in patient B/L samples and their PFS outcomes during ibrutinib-rituximab administration. Median F-actin RRI values were used as a cut-off point to determine weak (<median RRI) vs strong (>median RRI) CD4+ T-cell synapses (n = 52 patients). Patients’ showing strong CD4+ T-cell:CLL immune synapses at B/L showed significantly adverse PFS (9 progression events per 29 patients) compared with patients showing weak CD4+ T-cell:CLL interactions (1 progression event per 23 patients). (Cox model, P = .01; HR, 9.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-72.47). Bar chart: F-actin RRI analysis of CD4+ T-cell:CLL conjugates at B/L and representative 3D volume–rendered confocal images comparing patients who progressed (n = 7) with those who did not (progression free, n = 7) during ibrutinib-rituximab therapy. (I) Illustration of the cytotoxicity assay after ex vivo treatment of purified T cells (B/L, 6M, and 12M time points) and B/L CLL cells with anti–PD-1 (αPD-1) or anti–PD-L1 (αPD-L1) blocking antibodies (10 μg/mL) or isotype controls. (J-K) T-cell killing function against autologous B/L CLL cells examining T cells at B/L or at the 6-month ibrutinib-rituximab (orange) or FCR (blue) time points after ex vivo treatment with (J) αPD-1 or isotype control (indicated using “−”) (B/L: n = 6, ibrutinib-rituximab: n = 13, and FCR: n = 15) or (K) αPD-L1 or isotype control (−) (B/L: n = 6, ibrutinib-rituximab: n = 23, and FCR: n = 13). (L) Illustration of the autologous cytotoxicity assay incorporating the CD20 × CD3 glofitamab or a nonbinding antibody control. (M-N) T-cell–mediated CLL cell death using purified T cells from B/L, 6M, 12M, or 18M ibrutinib-rituximab (M) or FCR (N) time points against target B/L CLL B cells after ex vivo treatment with glofitamab (0.01 μg/mL) or nonbinding antibody control (indicated as “−”) (B/L, n = 13; ibrutinib-rituximab 6M and 12M,n = 6; ibrutinib-rituximab 18M, n = 5; FCR 6M and 12M, n = 7; and FCR 18M, n = 5 patient samples). Data for all cytotoxicity assay timepoints were normalized to isotype antibody control for panels J-K or nonbinding antibody control for panels M-N treated sample levels and presented as fold change data for each immunotherapy treated patient sample. Wilcoxon signed-rank test for panels B,D-E,J-K,M-N, multiple comparisons mixed effect analysis of variance for panel F and Mann-Whitney U test for panel H. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare cell death among CD20-TCB–treated conditions at B/L, 6M, 12M, and 18M. Original magnification ×63; scale bars, 10 μm. Bar chart data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. ∗P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. CMAC, CellTracker Blue (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin); TCB, T-cell bispecific antibody.

Ibrutinib-rituximab promotes CD8+ T-cell lytic synapse activity and supports immunotherapy-triggered anti-CLL killing function. (A) Illustration of the autologous cytotoxicity assay using anti-CD3/-CD28–activated T cells (cytolytic T lymphocytes [CTLs]) from B/L, 6M, and 12M time points mixed with target B/L CLL B cells (pulsed with superantigen as a model antigen) with flow-based quantification of T-cell killing function. (B) T-cell–mediated CLL cell death comparing T cells purified from B/L, 6M, and 12M time point samples (n = 30 patients per treatment arm). Data at 6M and 12M were normalized to B/L levels to generate fold change values for each patient. (C) The association between patient’s T-cell killing function (12M ibrutinib-rituximab time point, n = 30) and infection status during ibrutinib-rituximab therapy (no infections vs grade 2 or 3 infections) (Wilcoxon test, P = .01). (D-E) Representative confocal medial optical section and 3-dimensional (3D) volume–rendered images of T-cell:CLL conjugates formed between patient T cells (B/L, 6M, and 12M on-ibrutinib-rituximab [D] or FCR [E]) interacting with autologous B/L CLL B cells (blue, CMAC dyed). Bar charts: quantitative relative recruitment index (RRI) analysis of F-actin polarization (red, rhodamine phalloidin) in T-cell:CLL conjugates (n = 50 patients per treatment arm). (F) Box and violin plots (minimum-maximum) showing the percentage of CD4+ or CD8+ T-cell:CLL conjugates formed from the total T-cell:CLL conjugates in B/L, 6M, and 12M ibrutinib-rituximab time point samples (n = 15 patients). Representative confocal images of CD8+ (white) and CD4+ (green) T-cell conjugates with CLL B cells (blue) at B/L vs on ibrutinib-rituximab therapy. (G) Representative confocal 3D volume–rendered images of granzyme B (GrB; white) expression at CD8+ T-cell synapses, comparing ibrutinib-rituximab and FCR 12M time point samples. (H) Kaplan-Meier curve showing the association between the strength of polarized F-actin CD4+ T-cell:CLL immune synapse interactions in patient B/L samples and their PFS outcomes during ibrutinib-rituximab administration. Median F-actin RRI values were used as a cut-off point to determine weak (<median RRI) vs strong (>median RRI) CD4+ T-cell synapses (n = 52 patients). Patients’ showing strong CD4+ T-cell:CLL immune synapses at B/L showed significantly adverse PFS (9 progression events per 29 patients) compared with patients showing weak CD4+ T-cell:CLL interactions (1 progression event per 23 patients). (Cox model, P = .01; HR, 9.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-72.47). Bar chart: F-actin RRI analysis of CD4+ T-cell:CLL conjugates at B/L and representative 3D volume–rendered confocal images comparing patients who progressed (n = 7) with those who did not (progression free, n = 7) during ibrutinib-rituximab therapy. (I) Illustration of the cytotoxicity assay after ex vivo treatment of purified T cells (B/L, 6M, and 12M time points) and B/L CLL cells with anti–PD-1 (αPD-1) or anti–PD-L1 (αPD-L1) blocking antibodies (10 μg/mL) or isotype controls. (J-K) T-cell killing function against autologous B/L CLL cells examining T cells at B/L or at the 6-month ibrutinib-rituximab (orange) or FCR (blue) time points after ex vivo treatment with (J) αPD-1 or isotype control (indicated using “−”) (B/L: n = 6, ibrutinib-rituximab: n = 13, and FCR: n = 15) or (K) αPD-L1 or isotype control (−) (B/L: n = 6, ibrutinib-rituximab: n = 23, and FCR: n = 13). (L) Illustration of the autologous cytotoxicity assay incorporating the CD20 × CD3 glofitamab or a nonbinding antibody control. (M-N) T-cell–mediated CLL cell death using purified T cells from B/L, 6M, 12M, or 18M ibrutinib-rituximab (M) or FCR (N) time points against target B/L CLL B cells after ex vivo treatment with glofitamab (0.01 μg/mL) or nonbinding antibody control (indicated as “−”) (B/L, n = 13; ibrutinib-rituximab 6M and 12M,n = 6; ibrutinib-rituximab 18M, n = 5; FCR 6M and 12M, n = 7; and FCR 18M, n = 5 patient samples). Data for all cytotoxicity assay timepoints were normalized to isotype antibody control for panels J-K or nonbinding antibody control for panels M-N treated sample levels and presented as fold change data for each immunotherapy treated patient sample. Wilcoxon signed-rank test for panels B,D-E,J-K,M-N, multiple comparisons mixed effect analysis of variance for panel F and Mann-Whitney U test for panel H. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare cell death among CD20-TCB–treated conditions at B/L, 6M, 12M, and 18M. Original magnification ×63; scale bars, 10 μm. Bar chart data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. ∗P < .05; ∗∗P < .01; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗∗∗P < .0001. CMAC, CellTracker Blue (7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin); TCB, T-cell bispecific antibody.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal