Figure 3.
Cardiac physiology and protein expression in heart muscle. (A) Hemodynamics measurements. (B) Sarcomere length differences as determined through TEM analysis. (C) Mitochondrial quantification of TEM images. (D) TEM sections at 1 μm (mf, myofibrils; mi, mitochondria). (E) Genotype-specific protein expression was observed in the LV, as measured by t test. Protein abundances were grouped as being significantly increased (red box) or significantly decreased (blue box) in hG6PDMed− mice. (F) Each group was entered for GO enrichment analysis, per LV. Red bars indicate significantly increased and blue bars indicate significantly decreased biological processes in hG6PDMed− mice. (G) Proteomics identification of heart muscle–specific proteins. (H) Significant mitochondrial proteins identified in the heart muscle. (I) Extracellular matrix of LV composition differences identified via proteomics (significance ∗P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗P < .001, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001).

Cardiac physiology and protein expression in heart muscle. (A) Hemodynamics measurements. (B) Sarcomere length differences as determined through TEM analysis. (C) Mitochondrial quantification of TEM images. (D) TEM sections at 1 μm (mf, myofibrils; mi, mitochondria). (E) Genotype-specific protein expression was observed in the LV, as measured by t test. Protein abundances were grouped as being significantly increased (red box) or significantly decreased (blue box) in hG6PDMed− mice. (F) Each group was entered for GO enrichment analysis, per LV. Red bars indicate significantly increased and blue bars indicate significantly decreased biological processes in hG6PDMed− mice. (G) Proteomics identification of heart muscle–specific proteins. (H) Significant mitochondrial proteins identified in the heart muscle. (I) Extracellular matrix of LV composition differences identified via proteomics (significance ∗P < .05, ∗∗P < .01, ∗∗∗P < .001, ∗∗∗∗P < .0001).

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal