Figure 4.
MRD-negativity rates during treatment in the intention to treat population (N = 39) and concordance between NGS and NGF methods. (A) This table shows the MRD-negativity rates overall and stratified by cytogenetic risk. HRC is defined as del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or t(14;20) and/or gain or amplification of 1q. (B-C) Panel B shows the postinduction MRD concordance between NGS and NGF methods at 10−5 and 10−6 sensitivity, whereas panel C shows the MRD concordance between NGS and NGF methods at 10−5 and 10−6 sensitivity for the best MRD status. Sample size for each of the concordance analyses include patients with results from both NGS and NGF testing at the applicable sensitivity.

MRD-negativity rates during treatment in the intention to treat population (N = 39) and concordance between NGS and NGF methods. (A) This table shows the MRD-negativity rates overall and stratified by cytogenetic risk. HRC is defined as del(17p) and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16) and/or t(14;20) and/or gain or amplification of 1q. (B-C) Panel B shows the postinduction MRD concordance between NGS and NGF methods at 10−5 and 10−6 sensitivity, whereas panel C shows the MRD concordance between NGS and NGF methods at 10−5 and 10−6 sensitivity for the best MRD status. Sample size for each of the concordance analyses include patients with results from both NGS and NGF testing at the applicable sensitivity.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal