Figure 5.
Effect of age and sex stratification on multiple elongation measurements taken under an osmotic gradient of biological age–profiled RCCs. (A) Delta elongation measurements for the 3 populations of RBCs (U-RBCs, Y-RBCs, and O-RBCs) without any stratification based on donor characteristics. (B) Delta elongation conveyed as age stratified for O-RBCs only. (C) EIhyper measurements for the 3 populations of RBCs (U-RBCs, Y-RBCs, and O-RBCs) without any stratification based on donor characteristics. (D) EIhyper conveyed as age and sex stratified for O-RBCs only. (E) EImin measurements for the 3 populations of RBCs (U-RBCs, Y-RBCs, and O-RBCs) without any stratification based on donor characteristics. (F) EImin conveyed as age and sex stratified for Y-RBCs only. Multiple comparisons tests were used to show significant differences (∗∗∗∗P < .0001; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗P < .01; ∗P < .05). Median and IQR are indicated as horizontal lines on the violin plots.

Effect of age and sex stratification on multiple elongation measurements taken under an osmotic gradient of biological age–profiled RCCs. (A) Delta elongation measurements for the 3 populations of RBCs (U-RBCs, Y-RBCs, and O-RBCs) without any stratification based on donor characteristics. (B) Delta elongation conveyed as age stratified for O-RBCs only. (C) EIhyper measurements for the 3 populations of RBCs (U-RBCs, Y-RBCs, and O-RBCs) without any stratification based on donor characteristics. (D) EIhyper conveyed as age and sex stratified for O-RBCs only. (E) EImin measurements for the 3 populations of RBCs (U-RBCs, Y-RBCs, and O-RBCs) without any stratification based on donor characteristics. (F) EImin conveyed as age and sex stratified for Y-RBCs only. Multiple comparisons tests were used to show significant differences (∗∗∗∗P < .0001; ∗∗∗P < .001; ∗∗P < .01; ∗P < .05). Median and IQR are indicated as horizontal lines on the violin plots.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal