Figure 2.
Figure 2. aRh17 and aWrb antibodies demonstrate differential effects on RBC resistance to osmotic and mechanical stress. Osmotic stress was induced by incubation in buffered (10 mM sodium phosphate) saline at a range of osmolalities (0-308 mOsm). Mechanical stress was induced by rotation in the presence of glass beads at 1% hematocrit (Hct). Antibodies were added at 10 nM and 100 nM to 5% Hct RBC suspension, which produces a ratio of ∼104 and 105 ligands per RBC and is below saturation for both target antigens. (A) RBCs treated with 500 nM aWrb scFv (blue) showed a left shift in the osmotic lysis curve compared with naive (green) or aRh17 scFv-treated RBCs (red). (B) RBCs treated with aWrb but not aRh17 showed a significant change in the concentration required for 50% hemolysis (128 vs 120 mOsm, n = 3, *P < .05, 1-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons). (C) aWrb scFv-treated RBCs (blue) show a dose-dependent decrease in hemolysis in response to osmotic stress at 128 mOsm (EC50 for naive RBCs) and (D) a dose-dependent increase in hemolysis in response to mechanical stress. aRh17 scFv-treated RBCs (red) do not demonstrate any significant change in response to (E) osmotic stress or (F) mechanical stress. In all experiments, means ± standard deviation (SD) are shown; n = 3 for each condition (*P < .05 compared with naive, 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons). ns, not significant.

aRh17 and aWrb antibodies demonstrate differential effects on RBC resistance to osmotic and mechanical stress. Osmotic stress was induced by incubation in buffered (10 mM sodium phosphate) saline at a range of osmolalities (0-308 mOsm). Mechanical stress was induced by rotation in the presence of glass beads at 1% hematocrit (Hct). Antibodies were added at 10 nM and 100 nM to 5% Hct RBC suspension, which produces a ratio of ∼104 and 105 ligands per RBC and is below saturation for both target antigens. (A) RBCs treated with 500 nM aWrb scFv (blue) showed a left shift in the osmotic lysis curve compared with naive (green) or aRh17 scFv-treated RBCs (red). (B) RBCs treated with aWrb but not aRh17 showed a significant change in the concentration required for 50% hemolysis (128 vs 120 mOsm, n = 3, *P < .05, 1-way analysis of variance [ANOVA] with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons). (C) aWrb scFv-treated RBCs (blue) show a dose-dependent decrease in hemolysis in response to osmotic stress at 128 mOsm (EC50 for naive RBCs) and (D) a dose-dependent increase in hemolysis in response to mechanical stress. aRh17 scFv-treated RBCs (red) do not demonstrate any significant change in response to (E) osmotic stress or (F) mechanical stress. In all experiments, means ± standard deviation (SD) are shown; n = 3 for each condition (*P < .05 compared with naive, 1-way ANOVA with Holm-Sidak correction for multiple comparisons). ns, not significant.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal