Figure 5
Figure 5. Regulatory capacity is contained within the CD25highCD27−CD62L−CD45RO+ T-cell subset that expresses FoxP3, CTLA-4, and GITR. (A) CD4+CD25− T cells were stimulated with allogeneic stimulator cells. CD25 expression was analyzed in the CD4+ T-cell fraction of FK778-treated cells (top plot) and untreated control cells (bottom plot). (B) The subsets formed upon FK778 treatment, separated using flow cytometric cell sorting, and were restimulated (2 × 104) with allogeneic stimulator cells (5 × 104). Proliferation during the secondary culture, in the absence of FK778, was examined in the absence (left panel) or presence (right panel) of 12.5 U/mL IL-2. At the peak of proliferation, *P < .002 for differences between untreated and FK778-treated CD25high cells. (C) The suppressive capacity of the sorted subsets, after stimulation in the presence (top graph) or absence (bottom graph) of FK778, was investigated in a coculture assay. At day 6, proliferation of naive CD4+CD25− responder T cells (5 × 104) stimulated with allogeneic stimulator cells (5 × 104) was studied in the absence or presence of increasing numbers of the CD25− (•), CD25intermediate (), or CD25high (○) cells (*P < .05; **P < .01 for differences between untreated and FK778-treated cells). (D) Flow cytometric FoxP3 analysis (x-axis) plotted against CD4 expression (y-axis) of the sorted CD25high and CD25intermediate subsets from the FK778-treated (left panels) and the untreated control groups (right panels). (E) Flow cytometry was performed directly after cell sorting of the CD4+CD25high T cells at day 6. One representative experiment of 2 is presented. For panels B and C, error bars represent SD counts.

Regulatory capacity is contained within the CD25highCD27CD62LCD45RO+ T-cell subset that expresses FoxP3, CTLA-4, and GITR. (A) CD4+CD25 T cells were stimulated with allogeneic stimulator cells. CD25 expression was analyzed in the CD4+ T-cell fraction of FK778-treated cells (top plot) and untreated control cells (bottom plot). (B) The subsets formed upon FK778 treatment, separated using flow cytometric cell sorting, and were restimulated (2 × 104) with allogeneic stimulator cells (5 × 104). Proliferation during the secondary culture, in the absence of FK778, was examined in the absence (left panel) or presence (right panel) of 12.5 U/mL IL-2. At the peak of proliferation, *P < .002 for differences between untreated and FK778-treated CD25high cells. (C) The suppressive capacity of the sorted subsets, after stimulation in the presence (top graph) or absence (bottom graph) of FK778, was investigated in a coculture assay. At day 6, proliferation of naive CD4+CD25 responder T cells (5 × 104) stimulated with allogeneic stimulator cells (5 × 104) was studied in the absence or presence of increasing numbers of the CD25 (•), CD25intermediate (), or CD25high (○) cells (*P < .05; **P < .01 for differences between untreated and FK778-treated cells). (D) Flow cytometric FoxP3 analysis (x-axis) plotted against CD4 expression (y-axis) of the sorted CD25high and CD25intermediate subsets from the FK778-treated (left panels) and the untreated control groups (right panels). (E) Flow cytometry was performed directly after cell sorting of the CD4+CD25high T cells at day 6. One representative experiment of 2 is presented. For panels B and C, error bars represent SD counts.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal