Figure 5
Figure 5. Assessment of granulocyte recruitment in response to chitin and thioglycolate. The accumulation of eosinophils (A,C) and neutrophils (B,D) in the BALF of chitin-challenged (A) and the peritoneum of thioglycolate (TG)–challenged Pirb−/− or wild-type (WT) mice was assessed by differential cell counts. Data are expressed as means plus or minus SD of n = 3 (6-8 mice per experimental group); *P < .05; ns indicates nonsignificant when comparing chitin-challenged or TG-challenged WT and Pirb−/− mice. (E) LTB4 was assessed in the peritoneal lavage fluid of thioglycolate-challenged WT and Pirb−/− mice. Data are expressed as means plus or minus SD of n = 3 (6-8 mice per experimental group). The dashed line represents the detection limit of the assay.

Assessment of granulocyte recruitment in response to chitin and thioglycolate. The accumulation of eosinophils (A,C) and neutrophils (B,D) in the BALF of chitin-challenged (A) and the peritoneum of thioglycolate (TG)–challenged Pirb−/− or wild-type (WT) mice was assessed by differential cell counts. Data are expressed as means plus or minus SD of n = 3 (6-8 mice per experimental group); *P < .05; ns indicates nonsignificant when comparing chitin-challenged or TG-challenged WT and Pirb−/− mice. (E) LTB4 was assessed in the peritoneal lavage fluid of thioglycolate-challenged WT and Pirb−/− mice. Data are expressed as means plus or minus SD of n = 3 (6-8 mice per experimental group). The dashed line represents the detection limit of the assay.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal