Figure 1
Figure 1. In vitro–specific targeting of A20-Ig peptide ligands. (A) ELISA binding analysis of selected phages clones (left) or phage derived N-biotinylated synthetic peptides (middle) to purified A20-Ig. Peptide binding to polyclonal mouse immunoglobulins is also shown (right). Absorbance was calculated as the difference between OD405nm and OD620nm. Mean absorbance values ± SEMs of 4 independent experiments are shown; RU indicates relative units. The wild-type f88-4 phage, or a scrambled peptide (pCNT) was used as a control for the binding analysis of the selected phage clones or peptides, respectively. (B) Binding of FITC-conjugated peptides to A20 target cells by flow cytometry. Values are the mean fluorescent intensities (MFIs), representative of 2 independent experiments (n = 4). (C) Surface plasmon resonance analysis of the binding of the pA20-36 to A20-Ig. (D) Colocalization of FITC-conjugated pA20-36 peptide with the surface A20-Ig, as shown by confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 10 μm. In the diagram, the intensity profile for the pA20-36 and A20-Ig channel along a line scan through a representative cell is shown. Pictures were captured with a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope with a HCX PL APO 63.0×/1.40 oil UV objective (NA1.40) in glycerol and acquired with Leica Confocal Software Version 2.61. Image manipulation was performed with Adobe Photoshop CS.

In vitro–specific targeting of A20-Ig peptide ligands. (A) ELISA binding analysis of selected phages clones (left) or phage derived N-biotinylated synthetic peptides (middle) to purified A20-Ig. Peptide binding to polyclonal mouse immunoglobulins is also shown (right). Absorbance was calculated as the difference between OD405nm and OD620nm. Mean absorbance values ± SEMs of 4 independent experiments are shown; RU indicates relative units. The wild-type f88-4 phage, or a scrambled peptide (pCNT) was used as a control for the binding analysis of the selected phage clones or peptides, respectively. (B) Binding of FITC-conjugated peptides to A20 target cells by flow cytometry. Values are the mean fluorescent intensities (MFIs), representative of 2 independent experiments (n = 4). (C) Surface plasmon resonance analysis of the binding of the pA20-36 to A20-Ig. (D) Colocalization of FITC-conjugated pA20-36 peptide with the surface A20-Ig, as shown by confocal microscopy. Scale bar = 10 μm. In the diagram, the intensity profile for the pA20-36 and A20-Ig channel along a line scan through a representative cell is shown. Pictures were captured with a Leica TCS SP2 confocal microscope with a HCX PL APO 63.0×/1.40 oil UV objective (NA1.40) in glycerol and acquired with Leica Confocal Software Version 2.61. Image manipulation was performed with Adobe Photoshop CS.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal