Figure 6
Figure 6. IEM characterization of granule subtypes. Platelets were fixed for immunoelectron microscopy as described in “Blood collection and platelet preparation.” Immunogold labeling was performed on 50-nm-thick cryosections, and the samples were analyzed on a JEOL 1200CX electron microscope. (A-F) Tubular granules were identified as α-granule after immunogold labeling with specific α-granule markers. Labeling of soluble (A-D) and integral membrane proteins (E-F) as indicated on the figures. (G) Quantification of the immunogold label over tubular and spherical profiles. Label densities were determined on electron micrographs at 30 000× nominal magnification, by dividing the total number of gold particles attributed to each subtype by the number of random intersections over the structure. For each marker, a total of 20 electron micrographs was evaluated. Label density is expressed in arbitrary units. Bars represent 200 nm.

IEM characterization of granule subtypes. Platelets were fixed for immunoelectron microscopy as described in “Blood collection and platelet preparation.” Immunogold labeling was performed on 50-nm-thick cryosections, and the samples were analyzed on a JEOL 1200CX electron microscope. (A-F) Tubular granules were identified as α-granule after immunogold labeling with specific α-granule markers. Labeling of soluble (A-D) and integral membrane proteins (E-F) as indicated on the figures. (G) Quantification of the immunogold label over tubular and spherical profiles. Label densities were determined on electron micrographs at 30 000× nominal magnification, by dividing the total number of gold particles attributed to each subtype by the number of random intersections over the structure. For each marker, a total of 20 electron micrographs was evaluated. Label density is expressed in arbitrary units. Bars represent 200 nm.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal